首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >China's new regulatory regime tailored for the sharing economy: The case of Uber under Chinese local government regulation in comparison to the EU, US, and the UK
【24h】

China's new regulatory regime tailored for the sharing economy: The case of Uber under Chinese local government regulation in comparison to the EU, US, and the UK

机译:中国针对共享经济量身定制的新监管制度:与中国的地方政府监管相比,Uber与欧盟,美国和英国的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although Uber's arrival in China has resulted in disruptive competition for incumbent taxi companies, it offers an attractive alternative in China's supply-demand-imbalanced urban passenger transport system. China's regulatory regime for Uber has evolved in three stages: from the regulatory vacuum prior to 2015 to its official legalization in 2015-2016, and the enactment of numerous local regulations in 2016, with specific and more demanding requirements for Uber. This policy is a part of the Chinese approach to the gradual liberalization of the urban passenger transport market. Policymakers should consider 'fair competition' as the guiding principle to balance the interests of sharing firms and incumbent service providers, as well as between different sharing firms. The core value of this principle lies in the benefits it provides for consumers and the way it engenders a pro-competitive market environment. The labor protection arrangements for sharing firms' laborers should be more flexible and diversified. In order to recognize whether an Uber-Driver is an employee or independent contractor, a new standard taking into account a range of factors should be established through collective negotiations between the participants of the sharing economy, and dialogues between members of the judiciary, academics, and the policymakers. Further, consumer protection law and personal data protection provisions should apply when sharing firms misuse their distinctive algorithmic management model to compete unfairly to the detriment of consumers and other users. Ex ante regulatory measures designed to protect the personal data of users should be introduced for deployment in the context of the sharing economy. When enforcing these rules, a balance should be struck ensuring free data flow that is essential to sharing firms' innovation and competition, and the need to ensure the level of data security required to underpin a well-functioning sharing society. (C) 2019 Chenguo Zhang. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管优步的到来给现有的出租车公司造成了破坏性的竞争,但它为中国供需不平衡的城市客运系统提供了一个有吸引力的选择。中国对Uber的监管制度已经历了三个阶段的发展:从2015年之前的监管真空到2015-2016年的官方合法化,以及2016年颁布的众多地方法规,对Uber提出了具体且要求更高的要求。这项政策是中国逐步开放城市客运市场的做法的一部分。政策制定者应将“公平竞争”作为指导原则,以平衡共享公司和现有服务提供商之间以及不同共享公司之间的利益。该原则的核心价值在于它为消费者提供的利益以及它带来有利于竞争的市场环境的方式。共享公司劳动力的劳动保护安排应当更加灵活和多样化。为了识别Uber-Driver是雇员还是独立承包商,应通过共享经济参与者之间的集体谈判以及司法人员,学者之间的对话,建立一种考虑多种因素的新标准,和决策者。此外,当共享公司滥用其独特的算法管理模型进行不公平竞争以损害消费者和其他用户时,应适用消费者保护法和个人数据保护条款。应该引入旨在保护用户个人数据的事前​​监管措施,以便在共享经济的背景下进行部署。在执行这些规则时,应保持平衡,以确保自由的数据流,这对于共享公司的创新和竞争至关重要,并且需要确保支撑良好运转的共享社会所需的数据安全级别。 (C)2019郑国国。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号