首页> 外文期刊>Computational Geosciences >Hybrid differential evolution and particle swarm optimization for optimal well placement
【24h】

Hybrid differential evolution and particle swarm optimization for optimal well placement

机译:混合差分进化和粒子群优化技术,可优化井位

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is no gainsaying that determining the optimal number, type, and location of hydrocarbon reservoir wells is a very important aspect of field development planning. The reason behind this fact is not farfetched-the objective of any field development exercise is to maximize the total hydrocarbon recovery, which for all intents and purposes, can be measured by an economic criterion such as the net present value of the reservoir during its estimated operational life-cycle. Since the cost of drilling and completion of wells can be significantly high (millions of dollars), there is need for some form of operational and economic justification of potential well configuration, so that the ultimate purpose of maximizing production and asset value is not defeated in the long run. The problem, however, is that well optimization problems are by no means trivial. Inherent drawbacks include the associated computational cost of evaluating the objective function, the high dimensionality of the search space, and the effects of a continuous range of geological uncertainty. In this paper, the differential evolution (DE) and the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms are applied to well placement problems. The results emanating from both algorithms are compared with results obtained by applying a third algorithm called hybrid particle swarm differential evolution (HPSDE)-a product of the hybridization of DE and PSO algorithms. Three cases involving the placement of vertical wells in 2-D and 3-D reservoir models are considered. In two of the three cases, a max-mean objective robust optimization was performed to address geological uncertainty arising from the mismatch between real physical reservoir and the reservoir model. We demonstrate that the performance of DE and PSO algorithms is dependent on the total number of function evaluations performed; importantly, we show that in all cases, HPSDE algorithm outperforms both DE and PSO algorithms. Based on the evidence of these findings, we hold the view that hybridized metaheuristic optimization algorithms (such as HPSDE) are applicable in this problem domain and could be potentially useful in other reservoir engineering problems.
机译:毫无疑问,确定油气藏井的最佳数量,类型和位置是油田开发规划中非常重要的方面。这个事实背后的原因并不牵强-任何油田开发活动的目的都是为了最大限度地提高总烃采收率,无论出于何种目的和目的,都可以通过经济标准(例如储层估计期间的净现值)来衡量操作生命周期。由于钻探和完井的成本可能非常高(数百万美元),因此需要某种形式的运营和经济依据来证明潜在的井眼配置,以使实现产量和资产价值最大化的最终目的不会被削弱。从长远来看。然而,问题在于,井的优化问题绝非易事。固有的缺点包括评估目标函数的相关计算成本,搜索空间的高维性以及连续范围的地质不确定性的影响。在本文中,将差分演化(DE)和粒子群优化(PSO)算法应用于井位问题。将两种算法产生的结果与应用称为混合粒子群差分进化(HPSDE)的第三种算法获得的结果进行比较,该算法是DE和PSO算法杂交的产物。考虑了在2-D和3-D油藏模型中涉及垂直井布置的三种情况。在这三种情况中的两种情况下,进行了最大均值目标鲁棒优化,以解决由于实际物理储层与储层模型之间的不匹配而引起的地质不确定性。我们证明了DE和PSO算法的性能取决于所执行功能评估的总数。重要的是,我们表明,在所有情况下,HPSDE算法均优于DE和PSO算法。基于这些发现的证据,我们认为,混合元启发式优化算法(例如HPSDE)适用于此问题域,并且可能在其他油藏工程问题中可能有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号