首页> 外文期刊>Community Development Journal >The link between community development practice and theory: intuitive or irrelevant? A case study of New Britain, Connecticut
【24h】

The link between community development practice and theory: intuitive or irrelevant? A case study of New Britain, Connecticut

机译:社区发展实践与理论之间的联系:直观还是无关紧要?康涅狄格州新不列颠的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In planning practice it is common to argue, discuss and bargain before creating a plan that most stakeholders can endorse. But what happens when the distrust between civic leaders and residents is so intense that there can be no common ground? Does planning theory intuitively guide our practice or does the gap between theory and practice make the former irrelevant to community development and planning professionals? Within the context of planning theories and principles, this paper offers a description of the setting, the planning concerns, and the process and evaluates a consultant planning firm's actions with respect to the revitalization of the Broad Street Business District in New Britain, Connecticut. It concludes with lessons for other planners and community development professionals involved in planning projects that take place in a climate of hostility and value conflicts.
机译:在规划实践中,通常会在制定大多数利益相关者可以认可的计划之前进行辩论,讨论和讨价还价。但是,当公民领导人与居民之间的不信任感如此强烈以致于没有共同点时会发生什么呢?规划理论是直观地指导我们的实践,还是理论与实践之间的鸿沟使前者与社区发展和规划专业人员无关?在规划理论和原则的背景下,本文对环境,规划问题和流程进行了描述,并评估了顾问规划公司在振兴康涅狄格州新不列颠的Broad Street商业区方面的行动。本章最后还为参与策划在敌对和价值冲突的气氛中进行的项目的其他计划者和社区发展专业人员提供了经验教训。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Community Development Journal》 |2006年第1期|75-88|共14页
  • 作者

    Zenia Kotval;

  • 作者单位

    Associate Professor of Urban and Regional Planning and Director of Urban Planning Partnerships Michigan State University USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号