首页> 外文期刊>Communications in Statistics >An Investigation of Agreement Between the Item Difficulty Coefficient Calculated in Accordance With Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory With Bland-Altman Method
【24h】

An Investigation of Agreement Between the Item Difficulty Coefficient Calculated in Accordance With Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory With Bland-Altman Method

机译:根据经典测试理论计算的项目难度系数与使用Bland-Altman方法进行的项目响应理论之间的一致性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study is to investigate agreement between item difficulty coefficients calculated relying on classical test theory and item response theory with Bland-Altman method. According to results, although there is a high correlation between Pj and b coefficient estimated with HGLM (hierarchical generalized linear model), 1P, and 3P models, it can be said that there is no agreement between two methods and cannot be used interchangeably. It is observed that the confidence limit is wide according to Bland-Altman graphics. Therefore, it can be said that there is no agreement between item difficulty values obtained from two methods. Bland-Altman method which is used in clinical studies mostly is suggested to be used in the comparison of methods used especially in the evaluation of student performance in education, in agreement studies among specialist considerations especially in terms of providing additional information to the studies in which correlation coefficient is calculated.
机译:这项研究的目的是研究依靠经典测试理论计算的项目难度系数与使用布兰德-奥特曼方法的项目响应理论之间的一致性。根据结果​​,尽管用HGLM(分层广义线性模型),1P和3P模型估计的Pj和b系数之间具有很高的相关性,但是可以说这两种方法之间没有一致性,并且不能互换使用。观察到,根据布兰德-奥尔特曼图形,置信极限很宽。因此,可以说在通过两种方法获得的项目难度值之间没有一致性。建议在临床研究中主要使用的Bland-Altman方法用于方法的比较,尤其是评估学生在教育中的表现时,在专家考虑之间的一致研究中,尤其是在为研究提供额外信息方面。计算相关系数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号