首页> 外文期刊>Communications in Statistics >Confidence Intervals for Difference Between Two Poisson Rates
【24h】

Confidence Intervals for Difference Between Two Poisson Rates

机译:两个泊松率之差的置信区间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article, we develop four explicit asymptotic two-sided confidence intervals for the difference between two Poisson rates via a hybrid method. The basic idea of the proposed method is to estimate or recover the variances of the two Poisson rate estimates, which are required for constructing the confidence interval for the rate difference, from the confidence limits for the two individual Poisson rates. The basic building blocks of the approach are reliable confidence limits for the two individual Poisson rates. Four confidence interval estimators that have explicit solutions and good coverage levels are employed: the first normal with continuity correction, Rao score, Freeman and Tukey, and Jeffreys confidence intervals. Using simulation studies, we examine the performance of the four hybrid confidence intervals and compare them with three existing confidence intervals: the non-informative prior Bayes confidence interval, the t confidence interval based on Satterthwait's degrees of freedom, and the Bayes confidence interval based on Student's t confidence coefficient. Simulation results show that the proposed hybrid Freeman and Tukey, and the hybrid Jeffreys confidence intervals can be highly recommended because they outperform the others in terms of coverage probabilities and widths. The other methods tend to be too conservative and produce wider confidence intervals. The application of these confidence intervals are illustrated with three real data sets.
机译:在本文中,我们通过混合方法针对两个泊松率之间的差异开发了四个显式渐近式两侧置信区间。所提出方法的基本思想是从两个单独的Poisson速率的置信度限制中估计或恢复两个Poisson速率估计的方差,这是构建速率差的置信区间所必需的。该方法的基本组成部分是两个单独的Poisson利率的可靠置信度限制。使用具有明确解决方案和良好覆盖范围的四个置信区间估计量:具有连续性校正的第一个法线,Rao得分,Freeman和Tukey以及Jeffreys置信区间。通过仿真研究,我们检查了四个混合置信区间的性能,并将它们与三个现有的置信区间进行比较:非信息性先前的贝叶斯置信区间,基于Satterthwait自由度的t置信区间和基于以下条件的贝叶斯置信区间:学生的t置信系数。仿真结果表明,建议的混合Freeman和Tukey以及混合Jeffreys置信区间是值得高度推荐的,因为它们在覆盖概率和宽度方面均优于其他。其他方法往往过于保守,并且会产生较大的置信区间。这些置信区间的应用通过三个真实数据集进行了说明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号