首页> 外文期刊>Combustion and Flame >Current status of the high-temperature kinetic models of silane: Part Ⅰ. Pyrolysis
【24h】

Current status of the high-temperature kinetic models of silane: Part Ⅰ. Pyrolysis

机译:硅烷高温动力学模型的电流状态:Ⅰ部分。 热解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present work compares the performance of seven reaction models with respect to a large experimental dataset relevant to the high-temperature pyrolysis of both silane (SiH4) and disilane (Si2H6). Their performances were established based on different validation criteria that account for the shape and the amplitude of the validation profile. Then, the model performances were quantified with a global error, which accounts for the experimental uncertainties. The most satisfactory model has a global error as low as 3.1 (i.e., meaning 3.1 times higher than the experimental uncertainty) and the highest fraction (74%) of criteria with a low error ( 2 ), while most of the models have large discrepancies with the validation dataset, global error near 8 and up to 110 for the less accurate model. The origins of these discrepancies are identified with reaction pathway and sensitivity analyses. Among the seven tested model, three main decomposition pathways are evidenced, including one more specific to the models presenting the lowest errors. Based on the global error values, the ability to reproduce all the experimental conditions, and the model analyses, the reaction pathways relevant to the high-temperature pyrolysis of silane and disilane are determined. In addition, the present study provides experimental and numerical guidance for the future developments of silicon hydride reaction models. The limited performance of most of the oldest reaction models may have a significant impact on our current understanding of the pyrolysis and oxidation kinetics of silane. (C) 2020 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本作本作比较了七种反应模型相对于与硅烷(SiH4)和硅烷(Si2H6)的高温热解的大型实验数据集的性能进行了比较。它们的表演是基于不同的验证标准来建立,该标准占验证配置文件的形状和幅度。然后,使用全局误差量化模型性能,占实验不确定性。最令人满意的模型具有低至3.1的全局误差(即,含义高于实验不确定性3.1倍),并且具有低误差(&lt 2)的标准的最高分数(74%),而大多数模型具有对于较低的模型,验证数据集具有验证数据集,全局误差差异,近8个和高达110。这些差异的起源与反应途径和敏感性分析鉴定。在七种测试模型中,证明了三个主要分解途径,包括呈现最低误差的模型更具体。基于全局误差值,测定与硅烷和硅烷高温热解的均外实验条件和模型分析的能力进行再现的能力。此外,本研究为硅氢反应模型的未来发展提供了实验性和数值指导。大多数最古老的反应模型的性能有限可能对我们目前对硅烷的热解和氧化动力学的理解产生重大影响。 (c)2020燃烧研究所。由elsevier Inc.保留所有权利发布。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Combustion and Flame》 |2021年第5期|526-537|共12页
  • 作者单位

    King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol KAUST Clean Combust Res Ctr CCRC Thuwal 239556900 Saudi Arabia;

    Tsinghua Univ Ctr Combust Energy Beijing Peoples R China;

    King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol KAUST Clean Combust Res Ctr CCRC Thuwal 239556900 Saudi Arabia;

    Tsinghua Univ Ctr Combust Energy Beijing Peoples R China|Tsinghua Univ Sch Vehicle & Mobil Beijing Peoples R China;

    Texas A&M Univ Dept Mech Engn College Stn TX 77843 USA;

    King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol KAUST Clean Combust Res Ctr CCRC Thuwal 239556900 Saudi Arabia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Chemical kinetics; Silane; Disilane; Reaction model;

    机译:化学动力学;硅烷;白叶;反应模型;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号