首页> 外文期刊>Collection Management >Collection Development and the Historical Record: Are We Forgetting Monographs as Primary Sources?
【24h】

Collection Development and the Historical Record: Are We Forgetting Monographs as Primary Sources?

机译:馆藏发展和历史记录:我们是否忘记专着作为主要来源?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contemporary academic libraries' collection development practices are influenced by limited space, complicated access models, and shrinking budgets that are competing for interests in print and electronic, and other outside forces. Librarians responsible for collections make tough decisions that unintentionally threaten to change how academic libraries build and curate collections for longevity. Much of today's discussion deals with immediate problems and offers few considerations about how these collection decisions will affect the availability and potentially the existence of historical evidence. Among the issues highlighted in this commentary are definitions of primary sources, researchers-used historical materials, and solutions for the identified problems.
机译:当代大学图书馆的馆藏开发实践受到空间有限,访问模型复杂以及预算缩减的影响,这些竞争正在争夺印刷,电子和其他外部力量的利益。负责馆藏的馆员做出艰难的决定,无意间威胁着改变学术图书馆为长寿而建立和策划馆藏的方式。今天的讨论大部分是针对眼前的问题,很少考虑这些收集决策将如何影响历史证据的可得性和潜在性。在本评论中强调的问题包括主要来源的定义,研究人员使用的历史资料以及所发现问题的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号