...
首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive Therapy and Research >A Daily Life Comparison of Sociotropy-Autonomy and Hopelessness Theories of Depression
【24h】

A Daily Life Comparison of Sociotropy-Autonomy and Hopelessness Theories of Depression

机译:社会向性自主性和抑郁绝望理论的日常生活比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The hopelessness theory and Beck’s cognitive theory of depression were compared, controlling for other factors associated with mood change and stress reactivity. Using a high-risk design, 179 individuals were selected based on cognitive vulnerabilities and substance use frequency. Assessments of mood, daily events, and specific attributions were acquired using the Experience Sampling Method. Strong support was found for attributional style and sociotropy as indirect determinants of depressed mood, as well as for the notions of causal mediation and vulnerability specificity. Hopelessness theory explained a slightly larger portion of variance in depressed mood overall. The personality diatheses described by either theory were largely independent of each other and their mechanisms of action were not influenced by depression history or substance use.
机译:比较了绝望理论和贝克的抑郁症认知理论,控制了与情绪变化和压力反应有关的其他因素。使用高风险设计,根据认知脆弱性和物质使用频率选择了179个人。使用体验抽样方法获得了情绪,日常事件和特定归因的评估。人们发现,归因方式​​和社会嗜好是抑郁情绪的间接决定因素,以及因果中介和脆弱性专一性的观念得到了强有力的支持。绝望理论解释了整体抑郁情绪中方差的较大部分。两种理论所描述的人格素质在很大程度上彼此独立,其作用机理不受抑郁史或药物滥用的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号