...
首页> 外文期刊>Cognition and instruction >The Use of Epistemic Tools to Facilitate Epistemic Cognition & Metacognition in Developing Scientific Explanation
【24h】

The Use of Epistemic Tools to Facilitate Epistemic Cognition & Metacognition in Developing Scientific Explanation

机译:认识工具的使用促进了解科学解释中的认知认知和元认知

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current research in science education and the cognitive sciences has highlighted the importance of epistemic tools in scaffolding learners to think in ways consistent with scientific practices. However, recent studies on epistemic tool have mainly focused on epistemic cognition, but not epistemic metacognition. Epistemic metacognition, which operates at a meta-level targeted at our own thought processes concerning the source, nature, and justification of knowledge, is a crucial component that promotes and regulates epistemic development. The aim of this paper is to illuminate how an epistemic tool mediates and supports epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition, and the difference between them. Drawing data from a design research study that introduced a specific epistemic tool called PRO (premise-reasoning-outcome) to describe the structure of a scientific explanation, this paper illustrates how PRO was used to facilitate the development of both epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition. Specifically, epistemic metacognition was developed by using PRO with multiple metacognitive instructional approaches to: (a) highlight the epistemic connections between the various components of an explanation, (b) prompt questions that regulate one's own thought processes, and (c) organize navigational markers that regulate key ideas linking the causality of an explanation. The findings from this study provide insights and evidence for a crucial theoretical link that is currently missing in our understanding of epistemic tools, epistemic cognition, and epistemic metacognition.
机译:目前的科学教育和认知科学研究强调了认知工具在脚手架学习者中以与科学实践一致的方式思考的重要性。然而,最近关于认知工具的研究主要集中在认知性认知,但不是认知的元认知。认识到以我们自己的思想,性质和知识的理由的思想流程为目标,这是一个促进和调节认知发展的重要组成部分。本文的目的是阐明认知工具如何调解和支持认知认知和认知性能,以及它们之间的差异。从设计研究研究中绘制数据,介绍了一个名为Pro(前提 - 推理结果)的特定的认知工具来描述科学解释的结构,本文说明了Pro如何促进认知认知和认知性能的发展。具体而言,通过使用PRO具有多种元认知教学方法的专业人士开发了认知的,(a)突出显示解释的各种组成部分之间的认知关系,(b)提示调节自己的思想过程的问题,(c)组织导航标记调节链接解释因果关系的关键思想。本研究的调查结果为目前缺少我们对认知工具,认知性认知和认知性能的理解时,提供了洞察力和证据。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cognition and instruction》 |2020年第4期|474-502|共29页
  • 作者

    Tang Kok-Sing;

  • 作者单位

    Curtin Univ Sch Educ STEM Educ Res Grp GPO Box U1987 Perth WA 6845 Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号