...
首页> 外文期刊>Cognition & Emotion >Emotional-stimulus processing in trait anxiety is modulated by stimulus valence during neuroimaging of a working-memory task
【24h】

Emotional-stimulus processing in trait anxiety is modulated by stimulus valence during neuroimaging of a working-memory task

机译:在工作记忆任务的神经成像过程中,特质焦虑的情绪刺激过程受到刺激价的调节

获取原文
           

摘要

Recent neuroimaging studies have examined the effects of anxiety on cognitive processing in the presence of emotional distractors. However, when the target stimuli themselves are emotional, it is unclear whether emotion acts as a distracting or enhancing influence. We predicted that anxiety levels would modulate the effect of emotion on neural activity in a valence-specific manner. In the current experiment, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine activity in brain regions associated with cognitive and affective control. Twenty-nine healthy adults, rated for trait anxiety, performed blocks of a 2-back working-memory task (using faces) in which facial expressions were either entirely neutral, mixed neutral and fearful, or mixed neutral and happy. Behavioural results showed no effects of anxiety on either accuracy or response time for any stimulus type. In event-related analyses, dorsal prefrontal regions tended to show reduced activation for emotional faces relative to neutral, suggesting possible neural facilitation, while the amygdala and ventrolateral regions linked to affective-interference showed increased activation to emotional faces. Moreover, in the left inferior frontal gyrus (Brodmann area 45), anxiety discriminated between the response to happy trials and fear trials. The higher the anxiety score, the greater the increase in activation for fear faces versus neutral. By contrast, the lower the anxiety score, the greater the increase in activation to happy faces. These results suggest that emotional content in target stimuli can both enhance and interfere with neural processing, and these effects may depend on emotional valence and participants' anxiety levels.View full textDownload full textKeywordsAnxiety, Working memory, Cognitive efficiency, Emotional stimuli, Emotional interference, Neural efficiencyRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930903384691
机译:最近的神经影像学研究已经检查了情绪干扰因素存在时焦虑对认知过程的影响。然而,当目标刺激本身是情绪性的时,尚不清楚情绪是分散注意力还是增强影响。我们预测焦虑水平将以化合价的方式调节情绪对神经活动的影响。在当前的实验中,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来检查与认知和情感控制相关的大脑区域的活动。 29名健康成人(因特质焦虑而定)执行了2背工作记忆任务(使用脸部),其中面部表情完全是中性,中性和恐惧混合,或中性和快乐混合。行为结果表明,对于任何刺激类型,焦虑对准确度或响应时间均无影响。在与事件相关的分析中,相对于中性,背侧前额叶区域倾向于表现出情感面的激活减少,表明可能存在神经促进作用,而与情感干扰相关的杏仁核和腹侧区则显示出对情感面的激活增加。此外,在左下额回(Brodmann区域45),对幸福试验和恐惧试验的反应进行了区分。焦虑评分越高,恐惧面孔相对于中性面孔的激活增加越大。相反,焦虑评分越低,激活笑脸的能力就越大。这些结果表明目标刺激中的情绪内容既可以增强也可以干扰神经处理,并且这些影响可能取决于情绪化合价和参与者的焦虑程度。查看全文下载全文关键字焦虑,工作记忆,认知效率,情绪刺激,情绪干扰,神经效率相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930903384691

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号