...
首页> 外文期刊>Climatic Change >The influence of negative emission technologies and technology policies on the optimal climate mitigation portfolio
【24h】

The influence of negative emission technologies and technology policies on the optimal climate mitigation portfolio

机译:负排放技术和技术政策对最佳气候减缓投资组合的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Combining policies to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere with policies to reduce emissions could decrease CO2 concentrations faster than possible via natural processes. We model the optimal selection of a dynamic portfolio of abatement, research and development (R&D), and negative emission policies under an exogenous CO2 constraint and with stochastic technological change. We find that near-term abatement is not sensitive to the availability of R&D policies, but the anticipated availability of negative emission strategies can reduce the near-term abatement optimally undertaken to meet 2°C temperature limits. Further, planning to deploy negative emission technologies shifts optimal R&D funding from “carbon-free” technologies into “emission intensity” technologies. Making negative emission strategies available enables an 80% reduction in the cost of keeping year 2100 CO2 concentrations near their current level. However, negative emission strategies are less important if the possibility of tipping points rules out using late-century net negative emissions to temporarily overshoot the CO2 constraint earlier in the century.
机译:将减少大气中二氧化碳(CO 2 )的政策与减少排放的政策相结合,可以比自然过程更快地降低CO 2 的浓度。我们在外部CO 2 约束下并具有随机技术变化的情况下,对减排,研发(R&D)和负排放政策的动态投资组合的最优选择进行建模。我们发现,短期减排对研发政策的可用性并不敏感,但是预期的负排放策略的可用性可以减少为满足2°C温度限制而最佳采取的短期减排。此外,计划部署负排放技术会将最佳的研发资金从“无碳”技术转移到“排放强度”技术。提供负排放策略可以使将2100年CO 2 浓度保持在当前水平附近的成本降低80%。但是,如果临界点的可能性排除在本世纪初使用世纪末净负排放暂时超过CO 2 约束,那么负排放策略就没有那么重要了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号