首页> 外文期刊>Climate Policy >Foreign policy 'trilemmas': understanding China's stance on international cap-and-trade
【24h】

Foreign policy 'trilemmas': understanding China's stance on international cap-and-trade

机译:外交政策“三难”:了解中国在国际上限与贸易上的立场

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article uses a policy analogy approach to explore China's attitude toward the possibility of global carbon market integration, including the development of a common cap-and-trade market for the global civil aviation industry. Like in other foreign policy domains, in international cap-and-trade, China faces a 'trilemma' between carbon market integration, state sovereignty and policy flexibility. By referring to how China has approached a comparable trilemma in foreign exchange policy making, we analyse China's possible stance on international cap-and-trade. We argue that China will prefer to gradually establish and strengthen, to a limited extent, intergovernmental governance mechanisms, which allow nation-states to prioritize sovereignty and policy flexibility in carbon trading policy making. In the conclusion we use this argument to explain China's responses to the carbon-trading initiatives of Australia, the EU, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), and the World Bank.
机译:本文采用一种政策类比的方法来探讨中国对全球碳市场整合的可能性的态度,包括为全球民航业开发一个通用的限额交易市场。像其他外交政策领域一样,在国际总量管制与交易中,中国面临着碳市场一体化,国家主权与政策灵活性之间的“困境”。通过参考中国在汇率政策制定中如何应对可比的三难困境,我们分析了中国在国际上限与贸易上的可能立场。我们认为,中国宁愿在有限的程度上逐步建立和加强政府间治理机制,以使民族国家能够在制定碳交易政策时优先考虑主权和政策灵活性。在结论中,我们用这一论点来解释中国对澳大利亚,欧盟,国际民航组织(ICAO)和世界银行的碳交易倡议的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号