首页> 外文期刊>Cities >Property-rights regime in transition: Understanding the urban regeneration process in China - A case study of Jinhuajie, Guangzhou
【24h】

Property-rights regime in transition: Understanding the urban regeneration process in China - A case study of Jinhuajie, Guangzhou

机译:转型财产权制度:了解中国的城市再生过程 - 以金华杰,广州为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A variety of stakeholders have proposed different models of urban regeneration of China, and indicate an institutional arrangement that is more complex than a model dominated by the government or neoliberal interests. This study argues that the path to an effective property-rights regime for urban regeneration has become circuitous as it has needed to follow the trial-and-error process of institutional transition in China. Operational-level rights originally assigned to different actors have been gradually reclaimed by the land users and by the effect of market forces through 'property-rights regime in transition'. Four rounds of regeneration were observed in Jinhuajie, Guangzhou over the past three decades, indicating the adoption of four property-rights regimes that have evolved sequentially, namely, a semi-open market for neighbourhood redevelopment, a semi-open market for land occupied by state-owned enterprises, an open market for redevelopment and an open market for both redevelopment and refurbishment. Each property-rights regime only reassigns one or two bundles of operational-level property rights from one actor to another to provide opportunities for older organisations to adapt to the new system. This inevitably led to an interweaving urban fabric and sub-optimal results of urban regeneration. This research suggests greater attention should be paid to cases of regeneration in different contexts as well as the interactions among the various stakeholders.
机译:各种利益相关者提出了中国的城市再生模型,并表明了一个比政府或新自由主义的模型更复杂的制度安排。本研究认为,城市再生的有效产权制度的途径已成为迂回,因为它需要遵循中国的制度过渡的试用和错误过程。土地用户逐步逐步地回收到不同行为者的运营级别权,并通过“转型性质”的“产权制度”的影响。在过去的三十年中,广州金华杰观察了四轮再生,表明采用了四个已经顺序演变的财产权制度,即邻里重建的半开放式市场,一个半开放的土地国有企业,开发开放市场,开放式开放市场,可重新开发和翻新。每个产权制度只将一个或两个从一个演员重新分配一个或两个捆绑的运营级地产权,以便为另一个行动者提供适应新系统的旧组织的机会。这不可避免地导致了交织的城市面料和城市再生的次优效果。本研究表明,应对不同背景下的再生病例以及各利益攸关方之间的互动,应更加注重。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cities》 |2019年第7期|181-190|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Elect Sci & Technol China Sch Publ Affairs & Adm Dept Urban Management 2006 Xiyuan Rd Chengdu 611731 Sichuan Peoples R China;

    Sun Yat Sen Univ Sch Geog & Planning Guangzhou Guangdong Peoples R China;

    Tongji Univ Dept Urban Planning Shanghai 200092 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Urban regeneration; Property-rights regime; Institution; Guangzhou;

    机译:城市再生;产权制度;机构;广州;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号