...
首页> 外文期刊>Challenge >The Politics of Paying Interest on Bank Reserves: A Criticism of Bemanke's Exit Strategy
【24h】

The Politics of Paying Interest on Bank Reserves: A Criticism of Bemanke's Exit Strategy

机译:银行准备金支付利息的政治学:对贝曼克退出战略的批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Federal Reserve has recently activated its newly acquired powers to pay interest on reserves of depository institutions. The Fed maintains that its new policy increases economic efficiency and intends it to play a lead role in the exit from quantitative easing. This paper argues it is a had policy that has a deflationary bias; is costly to taxpayers, and that cost will increase as normal conditions return; and establishes institutional lock-in that obstructs desirable changes to regulatory policy. The paper recommends repealing the Fed's power to pay interest on bank reserves. Second, the Fed should repeal regulation Q, which prohibits payment of interest on demand deposits. Third, the Fed should immediately implement an alternative system of asset-based reserve requirements (liquidity ratios) that will improve monetary control and can help exit quantitative easing at no cost to the public purse. Now is the optimal time for this change.
机译:美联储最近启动了其新获得的权力,以支付存托机构准备金的利息。美联储坚称其新政策将提高经济效率,并希望其在退出量化宽松政策中发挥主导作用。本文认为,这是通缩性偏见的政策。对纳税人而言代价高昂,且随着正常情况的恢复,该成本将增加;并建立机构锁定,阻碍对监管政策进行合理的调整。该文件建议废除美联储支付银行准备金利息的权力。其次,美联储应废除法规Q,该法规禁止支付活期存款利息。第三,美联储应立即实施以资产为基础的准备金要求(流动性比率)的替代体系,这将改善货币控制,并有助于免费退出量化宽松政策。现在是进行此更改的最佳时间。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Challenge》 |2010年第3期|p.49-65|共17页
  • 作者

    Thomas Palley;

  • 作者单位

    New America Foundation in Washington, DC;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号