首页> 外文期刊>Challenge >Letter from the Editor
【24h】

Letter from the Editor

机译:编者的信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this issue, we continue our special series on the application of Keynes's writings for today, a matter this editor thinks is widely neglected. The main argument Matthias Matthijs wants to make in his article is that the euro-despite some significant differences with the gold standard-nonetheless shows striking similarities with the workings of the interwar monetary system. In some sense, he argues, the euro suffers all the disadvantages of the interwar gold standard, without enjoying any of the advantages. This is the case especially from the point of view of the politics of adjustment during balance of payments crises (core vs. periphery), its inherently deflationary bias, against which Keynes warned, and the strong ideological commitment from Europe's political and financial elites to the gold standard or euro. He mainly draws on Keynes's writings on 'Inflation and Deflation' and the 'Return to Gold' (including "The Economic Consequences of Mr. Churchill") from his collected Essays of Persuasion.
机译:在本期中,我们将继续就今天凯恩斯著作的应用发表特别系列文章,该作者认为这是一个被广泛忽略的问题。马蒂亚斯·马蒂斯(Matthias Matthijs)在他的文章中希望提出的主要论点是,尽管欧元与黄金标准存在一些显着差异,但与战时货币体系的运作却有着惊人的相似之处。他认为,从某种意义上说,欧元遭受了两次世界大战之间金本位制的不利影响,却没有享受到任何有利条件。尤其是从国际收支危机(核心与外围国家)期间的调整政治,其固有的通缩偏见(凯恩斯警告称)以及欧洲政治和金融精英对欧洲的强烈意识形态承诺的角度来看,情况尤其如此。黄金标准或欧元。他主要从凯恩斯的著作《说服论》中借鉴凯恩斯关于“通货紧缩和通货紧缩”和“重返黄金”的著作(包括“丘吉尔先生的经济后果”)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Challenge》 |2015年第6期|475-476|共2页
  • 作者

    Jeff Madrick;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号