首页> 外文期刊>Central European History >Short Oxford History of Germany: Weimar Germany. Edited by Anthony McElligott. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2009. Pp. xviii + 324. Cloth $99.00. ISBN 978-0-19-928006-3. Paper $34.95. ISBN 978-0-199280070.
【24h】

Short Oxford History of Germany: Weimar Germany. Edited by Anthony McElligott. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2009. Pp. xviii + 324. Cloth $99.00. ISBN 978-0-19-928006-3. Paper $34.95. ISBN 978-0-199280070.

机译:牛津德国简史:德国魏玛。由Anthony McElligott编辑。牛津:牛津大学出版社。 2009年。 xviii +324。布$ 99.00。 ISBN 978-0-19-928006-3。纸$ 34.95。 ISBN 978-0-199280070。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To recommend a book in English (or German) that introduces newcomers tornWeimar Germany while at the same time offering scholars some food forrnfurther thought is notoriously difficult. Hans Mommen’s The Rise and Fall ofWeimar Democracy offers a dense, chronologically narrated political history. It is dif-rnficult to understand without considerable prior knowledge, as is Detlev Peukert’srnmore broadly conceived, intellectually stimulating The Weimar Republic: ThernCrisis of Classical Modernity. Moreover, both are by now a bit dated. Since thern1990s, a heterogeneous flow of studies has explored local societies fromrnGreifswald to Cologne, milieux from Bavarian peasants to Reichstag deputies, intel-rnlectual circles from left-wing social scientists to self-appointed conservative revolu-rntionaries, and aspects of political culture fromrepublican festivities to the activities ofrnright-wing women. It is this bewildering diversity that continues to fascinate histo-rnrians but makes any attempt at synthesis highly challenging. The volume underrnreview now aims to give structure to the period, to revisit some classical issues,rnand to explore more recent ones. It largely succeeds in this endeavor, and itrnbrings some much-needed contingency into the interpretation of the period. AsrnAnthony McElligott argues in his insightful introduction,Weimar, for all its prob-rnlems, had considerable accomplishments to its credit and benefited from morernpopular support and elite consensus than is often recognized. The idea of arn“doomed” republic warrants qualification because it pays insufficient attention tornshort-term political shifts. And Peukert’s “crisis of classical modernity” needs tornbe replaced by a more flexible emphasis on competing visions of Germany’srnpresent and future as a modern society.
机译:要推荐一本用英语(或德语)介绍向魏玛德国进发的新手,同时向学者提供一些进一步思想的食物,这是很难的。汉斯·莫门(Hans Mommen)的《魏玛民主制的兴衰》提供了密集的,按时间顺序叙述的政治历史。在没有大量先验知识的情况下很难理解,就像德特列夫·皮克特(Detlev Peukert)更广泛地构思,在智力上激发《魏玛共和国:古典现代性的危机》一样。而且,两者现在都过时了。自1990年代以来,各种各样的研究探索了从格赖夫斯瓦尔德到科隆的地方社会,从巴伐利亚农民到德国国会议员的环境,从左翼社会科学家到知识分子的圈子,到自我任命的保守派革命者,以及共和党庆祝活动的政治文化方面参加右翼妇女的活动。正是这种令人困惑的多样性继续使历史学家着迷,但使任何尝试合成的尝试都极具挑战性。现在,对不足的内容进行审查的目的是对这一时期进行结构调整,重新审视一些经典问题,并探讨一些较新的问题。它在此方面取得了很大的成功,并且为这段时期的解释带来了一些急需的偶然性。 AsrnAnthony McElligott在他有深刻见解的导言中指出,魏玛尽管存在所有问题,但在信誉方面取得了相当大的成就,并得到了人们普遍认可的更多支持和精英共识。 “濒临灭绝”的共和党的想法值得保留,因为它对短期的政治转变没有给予足够的重视。 Peukert的“古典现代性危机”需要被更灵活地强调德国作为现代社会的存在和未来的竞争观点所取代。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号