...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics >Bare metal stent implantation in large-sized unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in the drug-eluting stent era
【24h】

Bare metal stent implantation in large-sized unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in the drug-eluting stent era

机译:药物洗脱支架时代裸金属支架植入术在大型无保护左冠状动脉主干狭窄中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recently, drug-eluting stent (DES) has been recommended as the first choice in those patients who need stent implantation in unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of this procedure is still controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in ULMCA stenting in the DES era. We implanted BMS (mainly 4 mm-diameter) in large-sized ULMCA after December 2004 when DES became available. The results of BMS implantation (n = 19) were compared with those of DES implantation (n = 39). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding age, gender and coronary risk factors. Emergency procedures were more frequently performed in the BMS group than in the DES group (53% vs. 26%, p = 0.08). The initial mortality was 10.5% (n = 2) in the BMS group and 2.6% (n = 1) in the DES group (p = 0.25). There was no stent thrombosis, Q-wave myocardial infarction or emergent bypass surgery in either group during their hospital stay. The restenosis rate was 0% (n = 45) in both groups, and the target vessel revascularization rate was 5.9% in the BMS group (1/17) and 2.6% (1/38) in the DES group (p = 0.53). Therefore, there were no statistically significant differences in outcomes between the two study groups. These results indicate that BMS implantation in a large-sized ULMCA may be a safe and effective treatment even in the DES era.
机译:最近,在那些需要在无保护的左主冠状动脉(ULMCA)狭窄中进行支架植入的患者中,药物洗脱支架(DES)被推荐为首选。但是,该方法的长期安全性和有效性仍存在争议。这项研究的目的是评估DES时代ULMCA支架中裸金属支架(BMS)植入的安全性和有效性。 2004年12月DES可用后,我们在大型ULMCA中植入了BMS(主要是直径为4毫米)。比较BMS植入的结果(n = 19)和DES植入的结果(n = 39)。两组之间在年龄,性别和冠心病危险因素方面无显着差异。与DES组相比,BMS组执行紧急程序的频率更高(53%比26%,p = 0.08)。 BMS组的初始死亡率为10.5%(n = 2),而DES组的初始死亡率为2.6%(n = 1)(p = 0.25)。两组在住院期间均未发生支架血栓,Q波心肌梗塞或紧急旁路手术。两组再狭窄率均为0%(n = 45),BMS组(1/17)的目标血管血运重建率为5.9%,DES组为2.6%(1/38)(p = 0.53) 。因此,两个研究组之间的结局在统计学上没有显着差异。这些结果表明,即使在DES时代,将BMS植入大型ULMCA中也可能是一种安全有效的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号