...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics >Potential difficulty for accurate categorization of drug-eluting stent thrombosis without coronary angiography: unignorable involvement of the cases with new onset acute myocardial infarction occurred in target vessels
【24h】

Potential difficulty for accurate categorization of drug-eluting stent thrombosis without coronary angiography: unignorable involvement of the cases with new onset acute myocardial infarction occurred in target vessels

机译:在不进行冠状动脉造影的情况下对药物洗脱支架血栓形成进行准确分类的潜在困难:目标血管中发生了新发急性心肌梗死的病例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Very late stent thrombosis (VLST) is a major unresolved problem of drug-eluting stent (DES) implants. However, its actual incidence with respect to the distribution of DES-target vessel and accuracy of adjudicating stent thrombosis according to the ARC definition has not been yet adequately evaluated. We studied 720 patients who had completed over 1 year from elective DES implantation. In this cohort, we extracted patients who present acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n = 3, 0.4%). The timing of ACS events was 17, 19, and 24 months after DES implantation. At the time of presentation, VLST was strongly suspected as the initial diagnosis, however, coronary angiography (CAG) confirmed the different culprit lesion from DES and clearly no thrombus within the DES. According to ARC definition, three probable stent thromboses in this cohort before CAG, however, no stent thrombosis was confirmed after the CAG. Thus, no stent thrombosis was confirmed among this study population. In the very late phase after DES implantation, new onset ACS is not at all extraordinary occurrence in the target vessels of previous DES implantation. However, stent thrombosis is often assumed without angiographic confirmation. The clinical possibility that non-stent thrombosis is incidentally diagnosed with stent thrombosis without angiographic confirmation should be considered within the current accepted definition of stent thrombosis.
机译:晚期支架血栓形成(VLST)是药物洗脱支架(DES)植入物的主要未解决问题。但是,根据ARC定义,其在DES靶血管分布和判定支架血栓形成的准确性方面的实际发生率尚未得到充分评估。我们研究了720名经过选择性DES植入已完成1年以上的患者。在该队列中,我们提取了患有急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的患者(n = 3,0.4%)。 ACS事件的发生时间为DES植入后的17、19和24个月。在介绍时,强烈怀疑VLST是最初的诊断,但是,冠状动脉造影(CAG)证实了与DES不同的罪魁祸首,并且DES内显然没有血栓。根据ARC的定义,该队列在CAG之前有3个可能的支架血栓形成,但是在CAG之后未确认到支架血栓形成。因此,在该研究人群中未确认支架血栓形成。在DES植入后的很晚阶段,在先前DES植入的靶血管中根本没有发生新的ACS。但是,通常假定支架血栓形成没有血管造影证实。在目前公认的支架内血栓定义范围内,应考虑将非支架内血栓偶然诊断为支架内血栓而无血管造影证实的临床可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号