首页> 外文期刊>Business week >Why Not Bail Out Newspapers, Too?
【24h】

Why Not Bail Out Newspapers, Too?

机译:为什么不救助报纸呢?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

TO: Senior executives at U.S. newspaper companiesrnFROM: Tongue & Cheek Lobbying Innovations LLCrnThe post-Election Day landscape brings great change for Americarnand its governing philosophy, and this is why we must move quicklyrnto craft a federal bailout for the newspaper industry.rnI know from some previous discus -sions that not all of you agree. Unlike with banks, the collapse of American newspapers does not endanger the world's financial system. Unlike car companies, the newspaper industry does not lose billions of dollars each month. No matter. We can position this as a proactive move to save the only industry prominently mentioned in the Bill of Rights. (Our message team likes that last bit. You'll hear it a lot.) This industry employs over 52,000 journalists, thousands of other workers, and it faces unprecedented chal- lenges. It takes more than a quadren-nial sales spike from a closely watched election to save newspapers. Also, the bailout money is there, and-ask any struggling retailer or chain of hair salons soon to claim that they, too, are banks-it won't be there forever.
机译:收件人:美国报纸公司的高级管理人员从:Tongue&Cheek Lobbying Innovations LLCrn大选后的景象给美国及其管理理念带来了巨大变化,这就是为什么我们必须迅速采取行动为报纸业制定联邦救助计划。先前的讨论-并非所有人都同意。与银行不同,美国报纸的崩溃并没有危害世界金融体系。与汽车公司不同,报纸行业每月不会损失数十亿美元。不管。我们可以将其定位为主动行动,以挽救《人权法案》中突出提到的唯一行业。 (我们的消息团队非常喜欢这一点。您会听到很多。)这个行业雇用了52,000多名记者,数千名其他工人,而且面临着前所未有的挑战。备受关注的选举报纸需要超过四年的销售高峰。同样,救助资金也在那里,并且-很快向任何陷入困境的零售商或连锁发廊询问,它们也同样是银行-它不会永远存在。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Business week》 |2008年第4109期|124|共1页
  • 作者

    JON FINE;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号