首页> 外文期刊>Business week >CONSUMER-DEBT DISPUTES ARE THEY UNFAIR FIGHTS?
【24h】

CONSUMER-DEBT DISPUTES ARE THEY UNFAIR FIGHTS?

机译:消费者债务纠纷是不公平的战斗吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Readers argued vigorously about "Banks vs.rnConsumers," our June 16 Cover Story on thernbooming business of resolving credit-cardrndisputes and the way in which one firm, thernNational Arbitration Forum, dominates thernindustry. Many agreed with NAF's criticsrnthat the firm's decisions favor creditors atrnthe expense of unsophisticated debtors.rnOthers, though, asked for proof that therncourt system is any fairer when it comesrnto delinquent consumers. And while somernlamented the mandatory arbitration clauses in credit-card agreements, at leastrnone reader refused to be "incensed" that borrowers have to pay off their debtrn"according to the terms they agreed to."
机译:读者在6月16日的封面故事“银行与消费者”上激烈争论,这是解决信贷争端的商机,以及一家名为国家仲裁论坛的公司主导行业的方式。许多人同意NAF的批评家的观点,即公司的决定有利于债权人,而牺牲了不成熟的债务人。然而,其他人则要求证明,对违法的消费者而言,法院制度会更公平。而且,尽管赞扬了信用卡协议中的强制性仲裁条款,但至少“无人问津”的读者拒绝“诱使”借款人必须按照他们同意的条款偿还债务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号