首页> 外文期刊>Bloomberg business week >The Wrong Reach Of the Law
【24h】

The Wrong Reach Of the Law

机译:法律的错误范围

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the wake of the horrifying death of George Floyd at the hands of a police officer, in Minneapolis, observers across the political spectrum have found their answer: Prune back the doctrine of qualified immunity, which in most cases shields law enforcement officers from suits for the way they enforce the law. The New York Times editorial board is on the bandwagon. So is National Review. Representative Justin Amash, an independent from Michigan, has introduced a bill called the Ending Qualified Immunity Act. Well, good. I don't much care for the doctrine either, and I'd be appalled to see it applied to shield the officer who killed Floyd from civil liability (although it might be). But when we decry only the behavior of the police, we're overlooking a related issue, one that we might label the burden of law-an issue that's specially worrisome during the coronavirus pandemic.
机译:在乔治·弗洛伊德的恐怖死亡之后,在警察的手中,在明尼阿波利斯的观察者中发现了他们的答案:修剪了合格免疫的教义,在大多数情况下,盾牌执法人员他们执行法律的方式。纽约时报编辑委员会在潮流上。国家评论也是如此。独立于密歇根州代表贾斯汀amash介绍了一项称为结束合格免疫法案的法案。好吧,好。我也不多关心这些教义,我会被呼吁看到它申请掩盖杀死民事责任的官员(尽管可能是)。但是,当我们谴责警方的行为时,我们忽略了一个相关的问题,我们可能会标明法律的负担 - 在冠状病毒大流行期间特别令人担忧的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号