首页> 外文期刊>Business Ethics >The morals of moral hazard: a contracts approach
【24h】

The morals of moral hazard: a contracts approach

机译:道德风险的道德:契约法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although moral hazard is a well-known economic concept, there is a long-standing controversy over its moral implications. The language economists use to describe moral hazard is often value-laden, and implies moral judgments about the persons or actions of economic agents. This in turn leads some to question whether it is actually a scientific concept, or simply a convenient tool for criticizing certain public policies. At present, there is no consensus about the moral meaning of moral hazard, or about whether the concept can be salvaged by economists. As a first step toward resolving this problem, I suggest a contracts approach to moral hazard. I use the ` title-transfer' theory of contract to clarify the moral content of moral hazard, thereby increasing its value to scholars in numerous disciplines. A contracts view is useful for economic policy discussions because it does not include hidden value judgments. At the same time, however, it is also valuable for ethicists because it directly explains a moral dimension of behavior under moral hazard, namely, the violation of property rights.
机译:尽管道德风险是一种众所周知的经济概念,但对其道德含义却存在着长期的争议。经济学家用来描述道德风险的语言通常带有价值,暗示着对经济主体的人或行为的道德判断。反过来,这引起了一些疑问,即它实际上是一个科学概念,还是仅仅是批评某些公共政策的便捷工具。目前,关于道德风险的道德含义或经济学家是否可以挽救这一概念尚无共识。作为解决此问题的第一步,我建议采用合同方式解决道德风险。我使用契约的“所有权转移”理论来阐明道德风险的道德内容,从而提高其在众多学科中的价值。合同视图对于经济政策讨论很有用,因为它不包含隐藏的价值判断。但是,与此同时,它对于伦理学家也很有价值,因为它直接解释了道德风险下行为的道德层面,即侵犯财产权。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Business Ethics》 |2017年第1期|47-62|共16页
  • 作者

    McCaffrey Matthew;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Enterprise, Manchester, Lancs, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号