【24h】

Stable by Design

机译:由设计稳定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When I think back to my last several unstable approaches - I've had a few over the years - there are usually a few reasons behind each. Chances are they resulted from actions by other aircraft, instructions by ATC, sudden weather changes, or conduct internal to my aircraft - in other words, me. While there are things we can do to shape the outcomes of the first three inciting events, they are for the most part outside our control. The last item, however, is within our grasp of control. Or is it?It has almost become an unwritten rule: If you aren't stable by 1,000 ft. when in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC), go around. There is much discussion about how to wire in the correct vertical and horizontal parameters, establishing stable approach criteria, combatting pilot continuation bias and normalizing the go-around decision. In fact, I've done just that in these pages ("New Approach to Stabilized Approaches," May 2014).
机译:当我觉得回到最后几种不稳定的方法时 - 我多年来几乎没有了一些 - 通常有几个原因。 他们的机会是由其他飞机的行为,由ATC的指示,突然的天气变化,或在我的飞机内部进行 - 换句话说,我。 虽然我们可以做些事情来塑造前三个煽动事件的结果,但它们是我们控制之外的大部分。 然而,最后的项目是在我们对控制的掌握范围内。 或者是吗?它几乎成为一个不成文的规则:如果你不稳定1,000英尺。在仪器气象条件(IMC)中,环绕。 有很多关于如何在正确的垂直和水平参数中引线的讨论,建立稳定的方法标准,打击试验持续偏见并使转变决定标准化。 事实上,我已经在这些页面中完成了(“稳定方法的新方法”2014年5月)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号