首页> 外文期刊>Buses >WHAT THE LAW SAYS WE CAN DO
【24h】

WHAT THE LAW SAYS WE CAN DO

机译:法律规定我们可以做什么

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Three issues appear to have loomed largest in Buses readers' minds in the past 12 months, if the letters received by the Editor are any guide. These have been the replacement of the Routemaster, the variable image presented by FirstGroup vehicles and the risk to national security and personal privacy presented by bus photographers. The latter debate was kicked off in June when Steven Bousfield wrote of being moved on by a heritage official (whatever that might be) for taking notes and photographs in London's Parliament Square. That he was told to move only a matter of feet just emphasised the absurdity of the situation; do potential terrorists have acute myopia? His experience generated a flurry of correspondence from other readers citing their own experiences from which it became clear that some authorities are justifying their actions by reference to the Data Protection Act (DPA). The most sweeping application of this approach came from South Yorkshire PTE in August when it announced that photography was to be banned at all of its premises in order to comply with the DPA.
机译:如果编辑收到的来信是指南,那么在过去的12个月中,《公共汽车》读者心中最大的问题似乎是三个。这些已经取代了Routemaster,FirstGroup车辆呈现的可变图像以及公交车摄影师呈现的国家安全和个人隐私风险。后者的辩论于6月开始,当时史蒂芬·布斯菲尔德(Steven Bousfield)写道,文物保管官(无论可能是什么)被移至伦敦议会广场做笔记和拍照。有人告诉他只动一下脚,只是强调情况的荒谬。潜在的恐怖分子有急性近视吗?他的经历引起了其他读者的一连串信件,他们引用了他们自己的经历,从中可以明显看出,一些主管部门正在通过参考《数据保护法》(DPA)来证明其行动是正当的。这种方法最广泛的应用来自南约克郡PTE,该公司在8月宣布要遵守DPA禁止在其所有场所进行摄影。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Buses》 |2004年第597期|p.36-37|共2页
  • 作者

    MARK LYONS;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 公路运输;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号