首页> 外文期刊>Buses >RURAL CONTRASTS
【24h】

RURAL CONTRASTS

机译:农村对比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is little money to be made in rural bus services. Nothing new there. Even by 1962, the trade magazine Passenger Transport-merged with Buses Illustrated six years later to become today's Buses - recorded that Lincolnshire Road Car Company reckoned more than 50% of its network was loss-making. Inevitably it is the councils that fund deeply rural services, a difficult task for some as budgets are cut and cut. Yet there are sharp contrasts across the East Midlands, with each council following different policies with starkly different outcomes, as the Department for Transport figures for bus use in each authority show. At the extreme south of the region identified by the government as part of the East Midlands is Northamptonshire. Its county council effectively ran out of cash, and almost all bus subsidies have been withdrawn. However, some routes continue to run, often where a developer has provided funding as part of a Section 106 payment under planning legislation.
机译:农村巴士服务几乎没有钱。没有什么新鲜事。即使到1962年,贸易杂志乘客运输 - 与六年后的公共汽车合并成为当今的公共汽车 - 录制了林肯郡道路汽车公司的损失超过50%的网络损失。不可避免地是委员会,基于深深的农村服务,一项艰巨的任务,因为预算被削减和削减。然而,在东部米德兰斯突然存在鲜明对比,每个理事会跟随不同的政策,持续不同的结果,作为运输数据部门在每个管理局展会上的公共汽车使用。在政府确定的地区的极端南部,作为东部米德兰兹的一部分是北安普郡。其县议会有效地耗尽现金,几乎所有的公共汽车补贴都已撤回。但是,一些路线继续运行,通常是开发商提供资金作为第106条根据规划立法付款的一部分。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Buses》 |2020年第786期|52-54|共3页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号