...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists >Splitting rock vs. splitting atoms: What shale gas means for nuclear power
【24h】

Splitting rock vs. splitting atoms: What shale gas means for nuclear power

机译:分裂岩石与分裂原子:页岩气对核电意味着什么

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The past decade has seen a sudden surge in shale gas production in the United States, and a dramatic drop innnatural gas prices. The shale gas boom has major implications for the future of nuclear power, the authornwrites. Projections for the cost of electricity suggest that natural gas will maintain an advantage over nuclearnpower for many years to come in the United States, and there is reason to believe that overseas markets couldneventually enjoy some of the benefits of the shale gas boom. Uncertainties about the size of shale resourcesnand the long-term productivity of new wells could affect the future price of natural gas in the United States butnare unlikely to make nuclear power competitive with gas, the author argues. However, public fears aboutnenvironmental contamination could drive up the cost of natural gas. The author urges companies and policynmakers to address these fears in ways that build public confidence. Stringent climate policy probably wouldnnot eliminate the cost advantage of natural gas over nuclear before 2030, he writes, but could tip the balancenafter that. The biggest question mark looming over natural gas in a carbon-constrained world is the prospect ofnapplying carbon-capture-and-sequestration technology to the resource
机译:在过去的十年中,美国页岩气产量突然激增,天然气价格急剧下跌。作者写道,页岩气的繁荣对核电的未来具有重大影响。对电力成本的预测表明,在美国,天然气将在未来多年保持优于核能的优势,并且有理由相信,海外市场最终将无法享受页岩气繁荣带来的某些好处。作者认为,页岩资源规模的不确定性以及新井的长期生产率可能会影响美国未来的天然气价格,但不太可能使核电与天然气竞争。但是,公众对环境污染的担忧可能会推高天然气成本。作者敦促公司和决策者以建立公众信任的方式解决这些担忧。他写道,严格的气候政策可能不会在2030年之前消除天然气相对于核能的成本优势,但此后可能会打破平衡。在碳受限的世界中,天然气迫在眉睫的最大问号是将碳捕获和封存技术应用于资源的前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号