...
首页> 外文期刊>Buildings >Are demountable walls more cost effective in the long run over drywall?
【24h】

Are demountable walls more cost effective in the long run over drywall?

机译:从长远来看,可拆卸墙是否比干墙更具成本效益?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

"There's no question that demount-ables are far more expensive than basic drywall partitions on a straight, one-time cost comparison," says Eileen Goodman, director of interior design, Moody Nolan Inc. "They can be cost effective, however, if they're used in an application where frequent reconfigurations of hard-wall landscapes justify the initial expense." She also points out that, if wall reconfiguration is outsourced, economic advantages will shrink. Michelle Anderson, founding executive at Calgary, AB-based DIRTT, emphasizes keeping all wall-system pieces in mind (glass walls, doors, hanging capabilities, electrical and data requirements, etc.) when making this decision. "Add any higher-end detailing to these walls, or electrical, and your price gap will close dramatically (and occasionally reverse), allowing the movable product to be less expensive at first cost."
机译:穆迪·诺兰公司(Moody Nolan Inc)室内设计总监埃琳·古德曼(Eileen Goodman)说:“毫无疑问,在一次一次性的成本比较中,可拆装件比基本的干式墙隔板要贵得多。”它们用于经常重新配置硬墙景观以证明最初费用合理的应用中。”她还指出,如果将围墙改建外包,则经济优势将缩小。 DIRTT的总部位于美国卡尔加里(ABRT)的创始主管米歇尔·安德森(Michelle Anderson)强调在做出此决定时,请牢记所有墙壁系统部件(玻璃墙,门,悬挂功能,电气和数据要求等)。 “在这些墙壁或电气设备上添加任何高端细节,您的价格差距将急剧缩小(有时会倒转),从而使可移动产品的成本降低,而第一成本却降低了。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Buildings》 |2008年第5期|p.52|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑艺术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号