首页> 外文期刊>Buildings >Why the Vitriol in the Climate Change Debate?
【24h】

Why the Vitriol in the Climate Change Debate?

机译:为什么在气候变化辩论中使用硫酸?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An indignant or incensed letter from a reader is a rare occurrence for the editorial staff at BUILDINGS. Most letters and comments we receive are requests for amplification or information. I can think of only one topic that is likely to provoke an angry response - climate change. Last month we published an article in The Energy Manager e-newsletter entitled "Climate Change Kills Coal, Vaunts Solar Power." Although the primary focus of the article is on the changing economics of solar vs. coal, it's also clear that its author, Eric Woodroof, believes that global warming is taking place and that it is at least in part a man-made trend. His statement that "Every national academy of science in the world endorses that climate change is real and man-made" elicited this response from a reader.
机译:对于BUILDINGS的编辑人员来说,读者的愤慨或激怒是罕见的。我们收到的大多数信件和评论都是对扩增或信息的要求。我只能想到一个可能引起愤怒回应的话题-气候变化。上个月,我们在《能源管理器》电子通讯上发表了一篇文章,标题为“气候变化杀死煤炭,不利于太阳能发电”。尽管本文的主要重点是太阳能与煤炭之间不断变化的经济关系,但很显然,其作者埃里克·伍德罗夫(Eric Woodroof)相信全球变暖正在发生,并且至少在某种程度上是人为趋势。他说:“世界上每个国家科学院都认可气候变化是真实的和人为的”,这引起了读者的回应。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Buildings》 |2013年第10期|8-8|共1页
  • 作者

    Chris Olson;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号