首页> 外文期刊>Building >CASE IN FOCUS: ADJUDICATION
【24h】

CASE IN FOCUS: ADJUDICATION

机译:焦点:裁决

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2016 RLD entered into a contract with Rhatigan to construct six new homes in Wimbledon. The works were completed during 2018. On 4 June 2018 Rhatigan issued a draft variation showing a final account value of £8.6m that it said had been agreed at a meeting on 30 May. On 6 June RLD emailed to acknowledge the agreed £8.6m figure but mentioned that it would be premature and misleading for Rhatigan's contractor's reports to refer to the agreement until it had been finalised and executed as a variation deed. During September 2018 Rhatigan made an application for payment based on a gross sum of £8.6m. RLD denied that this figure had been agreed and in October 2018 Rhatigan submitted a further application for payment claiming a gross sum of £12.4m. RLD then commenced adjudication in respect of the proper valuation of Rhatigan's October payment application.
机译:2016年,RLL与Rhatigan签订了合同,在Wimbledon建造了六所新家。该作品于2018年完成。2018年6月4日rhatigan发布了一个票据草案,显示最终账户价值8.6万英镑,它表示已在5月30日的会议上达成一致。 6月6日RLD通过电子邮件发送给同意的8.6米人的数字,但提到rhatigan承包商的报告将是提及达成协议,直到最终确定并被执行,以作为一个变异契约所执行的,这将是过早和误导。 2018年9月,rhatigan根据总金额为8.6亿英镑申请付款。 RLD否认该数字已达成协议,2018年10月rhatigan提交了申请申请索赔总额为1240万英镑。然后,RLD开始对Rhatigan的10月付款申请的适当估值的裁决。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2019年第27期|42-43|共2页
  • 作者

    Ted Lowery;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号