...
首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >On the improvement of thermal comfort of university students by using electrically and chemically heated clothing in a cold classroom environment
【24h】

On the improvement of thermal comfort of university students by using electrically and chemically heated clothing in a cold classroom environment

机译:在寒冷的教室环境中使用电热和化学加热的衣服改善大学生的热舒适度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of two types of heated clothing (i.e., electrically and chemically heated clothing) in improving thermal comfort of university students while sitting in a simulated cold classroom environment. Eight male subjects performed three 90-min trials and three test scenarios were selected: EHC (i.e., electrically heated clothing), CHC (i.e., chemically heated clothing) and CON (i.e., the control, no heating). The trials were conducted in a climate chamber where the air temperature was 8.0 degrees C, RH = 80% and the air velocity was 0.17 m/s. Significantly higher mean skin (in both EHC and CHC) and body temperatures (in CHC) were found in the heated clothing compared to CON throughout the entire trials (p<0.05). The whole-, upper- and lower-body thermal (TS) and comfort sensations (CS) were improved in the heated clothing (rated 'Neutral' and 'Comfortable', respectively, throughout the test) than CON (aggravated with time) (p<0.05). Significantly higher finger temperatures (the 65-90th min, p<0.05), finger blood flow (the 2-5th min in EHC and the 2-10th min in CHC, p<0.05) and remarkably improved TSs at the hands and feet were detected in EHC and CHC than CON (p<0.05). Finger dexterity was improved in CHC at the end of the test than the beginning (p<0.05). CHC offered more heating benefits than EHC in terms of local skin temperature elevation at the trunk (p<0.05). In summary, the heated clothing could serve as an effective method to improve both local- and whole-body thermal comfort of university students while sitting in cold classrooms. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究旨在研究两种类型的加热衣服(即电加热和化学加热衣服)在模拟寒冷的教室环境中改善大学生的热舒适性的有效性。八名男性受试者进行了三个90分钟的试验,并选择了三个测试场景:EHC(即电加热的衣服),CHC(即化学加热的衣服)和CON(即对照,不加热)。在空气温度为8.0摄氏度,RH = 80%,空气速度为0.17 m / s的气候室内进行试验。在整个试验中,与CON相比,在加热的衣服中发现平均皮肤(在EHC和CHC中均)和体温(在CHC中)高得多(p <0.05)。加热后的衣服(整个测试中分别为“中性”和“舒适”)的全身,上体和下体的热(TS)和舒适感(CS)均比CON(随时间加重)有所改善( p <0.05)。手指温度显着升高(第65-90分钟,p <0.05),手指血流(EHC中第2-5分钟,CHC第2-10分钟,p <0.05),手脚的TS明显改善在EHC和CHC中检测到的浓度高于CON(p <0.05)。在测试结束时,与开始时相比,CHC中的手指灵活性得到了改善(p <0.05)。就躯体局部皮肤温度升高而言,CHC比EHC提供更多的加热益处(p <0.05)。总之,在寒冷的教室里,加热的衣服可以作为一种有效的方法来提高大学生局部和全身的热舒适度。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号