首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >Fast sorption measurements of VOCs on building materials: Part 2-Comparison between FLEC and CLIMPAQ methods
【24h】

Fast sorption measurements of VOCs on building materials: Part 2-Comparison between FLEC and CLIMPAQ methods

机译:挥发性有机化合物在建筑材料上的快速吸附测量:第2部分-FLEC和CLIMPAQ方法之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A new method was developed to measure on the field VOC sorption coefficients (k(a); k(d)) on the surface of a material by coupling a Field and Laboratory Emission Cell (FLEC) to a Proton Transfer Reaction-Mass Spectrometer (PTR-MS) as presented in the first part of this study. In this second part, the method is compared to the classical method based on a CLIMPAQ chamber coupled to an on-line GC analyzer. Different models were used to determine the sorption parameters from experimental data taking into account the sink effect on empty chamber walls and the presence of a boundary-layer. Determined sorption equilibrium coefficients K-e (k(a)/k(d)) for a mixture of BTEX on a gypsum board was found to be in good agreement between both methods. However, the CLIMPAQmethod seems to be less robust than the FLEC method in the determination of sorption coefficients since more than one couple of (k(a); k(d)), showing the same ratio K-e can retrieve the same CLIMPAQ experimental data. Giving this result, the question arises about the reliability of the literature data determined using emission test chamber which could be one of the reasons behind the discrepancies found between experimental indoor concentrations and predicted ones using chamber derived parameters. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:通过将现场和实验室发射池(FLEC)耦合到质子转移反应质谱仪上,开发了一种新方法来测量材料表面的VOC吸附系数(k(a); k(d))( PTR-MS),如本研究的第一部分所述。在第二部分中,将该方法与基于CLIMPAQ室和在线GC分析仪的经典方法进行了比较。考虑到空室壁上的沉陷效应和边界层的存在,使用不同的模型从实验数据确定吸附参数。发现在石膏板上确定的BTEX混合物的吸附平衡系数K-e(k(a)/ k(d))与两种方法之间具有很好的一致性。但是,在确定吸附系数时,CLIMPAQ方法似乎不如FLEC方法健壮,因为多于一对(k(a); k(d)),显示相同的比率K-e可以检索相同的CLIMPAQ实验数据。给出这个结果,就产生了关于使用排放测试室确定的文献数据的可靠性的问题,这可能是背后的原因之一,这些发现是室内实验浓度与使用室导出参数预测的室内浓度之间存在差异的原因。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building and Environment》 |2016年第4期|239-251|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Mines Douai, SAGE, F-59508 Douai, France|Univ Lille, F-59000 Lille, France|Univ Strasbourg, ICPEES, CNRS, UMR 7515, F-67087 Strasbourg, France;

    Mines Douai, SAGE, F-59508 Douai, France|Univ Lille, F-59000 Lille, France;

    Univ Strasbourg, CNRS, LIVE, UMR 7362, F-67087 Strasbourg, France|Univ La Rochelle, CNRS, FRE 3474, Lab Sci Ingenieur Environm LASIE, La Rochelle, France;

    Univ Strasbourg, CNRS, LIVE, UMR 7362, F-67087 Strasbourg, France;

    Mines Douai, SAGE, F-59508 Douai, France|Univ Lille, F-59000 Lille, France;

    Univ Lille 1, Lab Physicochim Proc Combust & Atmospere, F-59655 Villeneuve Dascq, France;

    Univ La Rochelle, CNRS, FRE 3474, Lab Sci Ingenieur Environm LASIE, La Rochelle, France;

    Univ Strasbourg, ICPEES, CNRS, UMR 7515, F-67087 Strasbourg, France;

    Mines Douai, SAGE, F-59508 Douai, France|Univ Lille, F-59000 Lille, France;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    CLIMPAQ; FLEC; Sorption; Building materials; Indoor air quality; Model;

    机译:CLIMPAQ;FLEC;吸附;建筑材料;室内空气质量;型号;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号