首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >Towards locating time-varying indoor particle sources: Development of two multi-robot olfaction methods based on whale optimization algorithm
【24h】

Towards locating time-varying indoor particle sources: Development of two multi-robot olfaction methods based on whale optimization algorithm

机译:定位时变室内粒子源:基于鲸鱼优化算法的两种多机器人嗅觉方法的开发

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Source localization is crucial for controlling indoor particle pollution. Locating indoor particle sources is challenging because the dispersion of particles is more complicated than that of gases, and the release rates of particle sources usually change with time in real-world applications. This study presents two multi-robot olfaction methods based on the newly emerging whale optimization algorithm (WOA), namely, the standard WOA (SWOA) and improved WOA (IWOA) methods, for locating time-varying indoor particle sources without and with airflow information, respectively. By combining experiments and CFD simulations, the presented methods were validated and compared with two particle swarm optimization (PSO)-based methods, namely, standard PSO (SPSO) and improved PSO (IPSO) methods. Four typical scenarios, including two time-varying source types (decaying source and periodic source) and two ventilation modes (displacement ventilation and mixing ventilation), were simulated and exported as virtual environments to test these methods. The methods were evaluated by the success rate (the number of successful experiments divided by the number of total experiments) and the average localization time of the experiments. The results showed that the SWOA method outperformed the SPSO method with a higher success rate (SWOA: 66.00%, SPSO: 52.00%) and a less average localization time (SWOA: 65.48 s, SPSO: 69.65 s) for all four scenarios. The IWOA method performed slightly better in success rate (IWOA: 97.75%, IPSO: 97.00%), while the IPSO method performed slightly better in average localization time (IWOA: 42.18 s, IPSO: 39.18 s) for all four scenarios. In addition, the most cost-effective anemometer was also determined.
机译:源定位对于控制室内颗粒污染至关重要。定位室内颗粒源具有挑战性,因为颗粒的分散比气体的分散更复杂,并且在实际应用中,颗粒源的释放速率通常随时间而变化。这项研究提出了两种基于新型鲸鱼优化算法(WOA)的多机器人嗅觉方法,即标准WOA(SWOA)和改进的WOA(IWOA)方法,用于在不具有气流信息和具有气流信息的情况下定位时变室内粒子源。 , 分别。通过结合实验和CFD仿真,对提出的方法进行了验证,并与两种基于粒子群优化(PSO)的方法,即标准PSO(SPSO)和改进的PSO(IPSO)方法进行了比较。模拟了四种典型场景,包括两种时变源类型(衰减源和周期性源)和两种通风方式(置换通风和混合通风),并作为虚拟环境导出以测试这些方法。通过成功率(成功实验的数量除以总实验的数量)和实验的平均定位时间来评估方法。结果表明,在所有四种情况下,SWOA方法均优于SPSO方法,成功率更高(SWOA:66.00%,SPSO:52.00%),平均定位时间更短(SWOA:65.48 s,SPSO:69.65 s)。在所有四种情况下,IWOA方法的成功率均稍好一些(IWOA:97.75%,IPSO:97.00%),而IPSO方法的平均本地化时间(IWOA:42.18 s,IPSO:39.18 s)略好。此外,还确定了最具成本效益的风速仪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号