...
首页> 外文期刊>Building and construction law >Statutory Adjudication And The Standard Building Contract In Singapore - Is The Final Payment Referable To Statutory Adjudication?
【24h】

Statutory Adjudication And The Standard Building Contract In Singapore - Is The Final Payment Referable To Statutory Adjudication?

机译:法定裁决和新加坡的标准建筑合同-最终付款是否可用于法定裁决?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The first case that went to the High Court in Singapore (Tiong Seng Contractors (Pte) Ltd v Chuan Lim Construction Pte Ltd [2007] SGHC 142) challenging the validity of an adjudicator's determination decided that the adjudicator's determination involving a final payment is valid. This case is important because it sets the guidelines on the interpretation of the provisions in the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act regarding the relationship between the Act and the payment provisions in the standard form of building contracts. This article examines the rationale of the decision of the High Court and concludes that it has unwittingly brought about legal uncertainty to the standing of a final payment.
机译:向新加坡高等法院提起的第一个案件(Tiong Seng Contractors(Pte)Ltd诉Chuan Lim Construction Pte Ltd [2007] SGHC 142)质疑裁决人裁定的有效性,该裁定认为涉及最终付款的裁决人裁定是有效的。此案很重要,因为它为解释《建筑业支付法》中有关该法与建筑合同标准形式中的付款规定之间的关系制定了准则。本文研究了高等法院判决的依据,并得出结论认为,该判决无意中给最终付款的地位带来了法律上的不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号