首页> 外文期刊>Brookings Papers on Economic Activity >Why Doesn't Capitalism Flow to Poor Countries?
【24h】

Why Doesn't Capitalism Flow to Poor Countries?

机译:资本主义为什么不流向贫穷国家?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We show that capitalism is far from common around the world. Outside a small group of rich countries, heavy regulation of business, leftist rhetoric, and interventionist beliefs flourish. We relate these phenomena to the presence of corruption, with causality running in both directions. The paper presents evidence that, within a country, those who perceive widespread corruption also tend to demand more regulation. As regulation is held constant within a country, this finding is hard to explain if one assumes that causality runs only from regulation to corruption. We also find that over time, increases in corruption in a country precede increases in left-wing voting. To explain our findings, we present a model where corrupt capitalists are disliked, and voting for left-wing policies is a form of punishment available to voters even in weak judicial systems. Evidence on emotions supports this explanation: the frequency with which people report experiencing anger is positively correlated with perceived corruption, but this relationship is significantly weaker when business is heavily regulated.
机译:我们表明,资本主义在世界范围内远非如此。在少数富裕国家之外,对商业的严格管制,左派言论和干预主义信念蓬勃发展。我们将这些现象与腐败的存在联系起来,因果关系在两个方向上都存在。本文提供的证据表明,在一国内部,那些普遍认为腐败的人也倾向于要求加强监管。由于一国内部的法规保持不变,因此,如果人们假设因果关系仅从法规到腐败,就很难解释这一发现。我们还发现,随着时间的流逝,一国腐败的增加先于左翼投票的增加。为了解释我们的发现,我们提出了一个模型,使腐败的资本家不被喜欢,即使在司法制度薄弱的情况下,投票支持左翼政策也是对选民的一种惩罚形式。关于情绪的证据支持这种解释:人们报告遭受愤怒的频率与感知到的腐败成正相关,但是当业务受到严格监管时,这种关系就明显变弱了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号