【24h】

Comments and Discussion

机译:评论与讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Those whom the gods love die young. Yet we grow old always learning new and interesting things. This paper by Sumit Agarwal, John Driscoll, Xavier Gabaix, and David Laibson does some justice to both these statements. And like all good economic papers, it identifies a trade-off. You can be young and foolish: at the peak of your cognitive abilities, but also very ignorant. Or you can be old and a bit slow: having accumulated a lot of experience, but with depleted analytical capital. In the middle is an "age of reason" at which you have learned enough and are still able to exploit your experience and to process new information. The paper argues that these dynamics are reflected in a life-cycle pattern of financial mistakes and performance. Its findings are relevant from a policy perspective, especially given the continuing aging of the population in most advanced economies. But I suspect they will be intriguing (and a bit scary) even for those who are not particularly interested in economic policymaking or behavioral finance.
机译:众神所爱的人早逝。然而,我们老了,总是学习新的有趣的东西。 Sumit Agarwal,John Driscoll,Xavier Gabaix和David Laibson的这篇论文对这两种说法都具有一定的道理。像所有好的经济论文一样,它也确定了一个折衷方案。您可能年轻又愚蠢:在您的认知能力达到顶峰的同时,也很无知。或者,您可能老了又有点慢:已经积累了很多经验,但是分析资本却用光了。中间是一个“理性时代”,您在这里已经学到了足够的知识,并且仍然能够利用自己的经验并处理新的信息。本文认为,这些动态反映在财务错误和绩效的生命周期模式中。从政策角度看,它的发现是有意义的,特别是考虑到大多数发达经济体人口的持续老龄化。但是我怀疑,即使对于那些对经济决策或行为金融不特别感兴趣的人,他们也会吸引人(并且有点吓人)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号