首页> 外文期刊>Brookings Papers on Economic Activity >BROOKINGS PAPERS ON ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
【24h】

BROOKINGS PAPERS ON ECONOMIC ACTIVITY

机译:关于经济活动的讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the second paper, Jeremy Nalewaik turns to a critically important issue in economic measurement. GDP, a country's overall economic output, can be measured either as the sum of all final expenditures or as the sum of all incomes earned. Yet despite the conceptual equivalence, the measure based on expenditure-which Nalewaik calls GDP(E)-has often differed substantially over recent decades from the measure based on income, or GDP(I). Currently, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the official source of data for both measures, emphasizes the expenditure-based measure as its "top line" measure, and the income-based measure (which the bureau calls gross domestic income, or GDI) rarely receives much mention in public discussion.
机译:在第二篇论文中,杰里米·纳莱维克(Jeremy Nalewaik)谈到了经济计量中一个至关重要的问题。国内生产总值是一个国家的总体经济产出,可以用所有最终支出的总和或所赚取的所有收入的总和来衡量。尽管有概念上的对等,但基于支出的度量(Nalewaik称之为GDP(E))在最近几十年中经常与基于收入的度量(即GDP(I))大不相同。目前,经济分析局(这两种措施的官方数据来源)都强调了基于支出的措施作为其“最高收入”措施,而基于收入的措施(该局称其为国内总收入或GDI)很少在公开讨论中受到广泛关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号