首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Local warming and insertion of peripheral venous cannulas: single blinded prospective randomised controlled trial and single blinded randomised crossover trial
【24h】

Local warming and insertion of peripheral venous cannulas: single blinded prospective randomised controlled trial and single blinded randomised crossover trial

机译:局部升温和外周静脉插管的插入:单盲前瞻性随机对照试验和单盲随机交叉试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To determine whether local wanning of the lower arm and hand facilitates peripheral venous cannulation. Design Single blinded prospective randomised controlled trial and single blinded randomised crossover trial. Setting Neurosurgical unit and haematology ward of university hospital. Participants 100 neurosurgical patients and 40 patients with leukaemia who required chemotherapy. Interventions Neurosurgical patients' hands and forearms were covered for 15 minutes with a carbon fibre heating mitt Patients were assigned randomly to active warming at 52℃ or passive insulation (heater not activated). The same warming system was used for 10 minutes in patients with leukaemia. They were assigned randomly to active warming or passive insulation on day 1 and given alternative treatment during the subsequent visit. Main outcome measures Primary: success rate for insertion of 18 gauge cannula into vein on back of hand. Secondary: time required for successful cannulation. Results In neurosurgical patients, it took 36 seconds (95% confidence interval 31 to 40 seconds) to insert a cannula in the active warming group and 62 (50 to 74) seconds in the passive insulation group (P=0.002). Three (6%) first attempts failed in the active warming group compared with 14 (28%) in the passive insulation group (P=0.008). The crossover study in patients with leukaemia showed that insertion time was reduced by 20 seconds (8 to 32, P=0.013) with active warming and that failure rates at first attempt were 6% with warming and 30% with passive insulation (P< 0.001). Conclusions Local warming facilitates the insertion of peripheral venous cannulas, reducing both time and number of attempts required. This may decrease the time staff spend inserting cannulas, reduce supply costs, and improve patient satisfaction.
机译:目的确定下臂和手的局部萎缩是否有助于周围静脉插管。设计单盲前瞻性随机对照试验和单盲随机交叉试验。设置大学医院神经外科和血液病房。参加者100例需要化疗的神经外科患者和40例白血病患者。干预神经外科手术患者的手和前臂用碳纤维加热手套覆盖15分钟,将患者随机分配至52℃的主动加温或被动保温(不激活加热器)。白血病患者使用相同的加热系统持续10分钟。在第1天,他们被随机分配为主动保温或被动保温,并在随后的探视期间接受替代治疗。主要疗效指标主要指标:将18号套管插入手背静脉的成功率。次要的:成功插管所需的时间。结果在神经外科患者中,在主动加热组中插入套管需要36秒(95%置信区间31至40秒),而在被动绝缘组中则需要62秒(50至74秒)(P = 0.002)。主动保温组中有3次(6%)的首次尝试失败,而被动保温组中有14次(28%)的尝试失败(P = 0.008)。一项针对白血病患者的交叉研究表明,主动加热可使插入时间缩短20秒(8到32,P = 0.013),并且第一次尝试加热失败的概率为6%,被动保温的失败率为30%(P <0.001) )。结论局部加温促进了外周静脉插管的插入,减少了所需时间和次数。这可以减少员工花费在插入套管上的时间,降低供应成本,并提高患者满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号