首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Choice and equity: lessons from lonsr term care
【24h】

Choice and equity: lessons from lonsr term care

机译:选择与公平:长期护理的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On the face of it, recent statements about the equation of choice with equity in the NHS and social care seem to strengthen the government's commitment to care services that are both fair and responsive. Few would oppose increased choice for consumers of public services as a general principle. The United Kingdom, when judged overall, has long had one of the most equitable healthcare systems among developed countries. Inequalities in healthcare provision and the health status of the population have, however, always been marked, and improvement in equity has always been an important policy objective. The government is now arguing that patients should be given more choice about how their own health care is managed and that this managed choice will help to drive up quality in the new, fixed price, internal market.
机译:从表面上看,最近有关NHS和社会护理中的公平选择等式的声明似乎加强了政府对公平和响应式护理服务的承诺。作为一般原则,很少有人会反对增加公共服务消费者的选择。从整体上看,英国长期以来一直是发达国家中最公平的医疗体系之一。然而,医疗保健提供和人口健康状况的不平等现象一直很明显,改善公平性一直是重要的政策目标。政府现在在争论,应该给患者更多关于如何管理自己的医疗保健的选择,而这种管理选择将有助于提高新的固定价格内部市场的质量。

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Medical Journal》 |2004年第7453期|p.1389-1390|共2页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Public Health Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号