首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Congenital anomaly surveillance in England-ascertainment deficiencies in the national system
【24h】

Congenital anomaly surveillance in England-ascertainment deficiencies in the national system

机译:英国的先天性异常监视-国家系统中确定性缺陷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective Firstly, to assess the completeness of ascertainment in the National Congenital Anomaly System (NCAS), the basis for congenital anomaly surveillance in England and Wales, and its variation by defect, geographical area, and socioeconomic deprivation. Secondly, to assess the impact of the lack of data on pregnancies terminated because of fetal anomaly. Design Comparison of the NCAS with four local congenital anomaly registers in England. Setting Four regions in England covering some 109 000 annual births. Participants Cases of congenital anomalies registered in the NCAS (live births and stillbirths) and independently registered in the four local registers (live births, stillbirths, fetal losses from 20 weeks' gestation, and pregnancies terminated after prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomaly). Main outcome measure The ratio of cases identified by the national register to those in local registry files, calculated for different specified anomalies, for whole registry areas, and for hospital catchment areas within registry boundaries. Results Ascertainment by the NCAS (compared with data from local registers, from which terminations of pregnancy were removed) was 40% (34% for chromosomal anomalies and 42% for non-chromosomal anomalies) and varied markedly by defect, by local register, and by hospital catchment area, but not by area deprivation. When terminations of pregnancy were included in the register data, ascertainment by NCAS was 27% (19% for chromosomal anomalies and 31% for non-chromosomal anomalies), and the geographical variation was of a similar magnitude. Conclusion The surveillance of congenital anomalies in England is currently inadequate because ascertainment to the national register is low and non-uniform and because no data exist on termination of pregnancy resulting from prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomaly.
机译:目的首先,评估国家先天性异常系统(NCAS)中确定性的完整性,英格兰和威尔士进行先天性异常监视的基础及其因缺陷,地理区域和社会经济剥夺而造成的变化。其次,评估缺乏数据对因胎儿异常而终止妊娠的影响。 NCAS与英格兰四个本地先天性异常寄存器的设计比较。在英格兰设有四个地区,覆盖约109 000例年出生婴儿。参与者先天性异常的病例在NCAS中登记(活产和死产),并在四个地方登记簿中独立登记(活产,死产,妊娠20周导致胎儿流产,以及在产前诊断出胎儿异常后终止妊娠)。主要结果度量国家注册机构识​​别的病例与本地注册档案中确定的病例之比,是针对不同的特定异常情况,整个注册机构区域以及注册机构边界内的医院服务区域计算的。结果NCAS的确诊率(与当地登记册中删除了终止妊娠的数据相比)为40%(染色体异常为34%,非染色体异常为42%),并且因缺陷,本地登记册和按医院服务区域划分,但不按地区划分。当登记数据中包括终止妊娠时,NCAS的确诊率为27%(染色体异常为19%,非染色体异常为31%),并且地理变化幅度相似。结论在英格兰,对先天性异常的监测尚不充分,因为对国家登记的确认率较低且不统一,并且由于没有产前诊断胎儿异常导致终止妊娠的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号