首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Social Work, The >A Critical Reflection on the Involvement of ‘Experts by Experience’ in Inspections
【24h】

A Critical Reflection on the Involvement of ‘Experts by Experience’ in Inspections

机译:对“经验专家”参与检查的批判性思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent research conducted in the UK for the Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) suggested that there was no evidence to indicate that the involvement of service users and lay assessors in service inspections improved the quality of inspections. However, recently, CSCI has initiated a project to involve ‘experts by experience’ in their service inspections. Here, the term ‘expert by experience’ has been adopted to describe users of social care services. However, the appropriateness of this usage has not been without some challenge and various conceptual difficulties have been raised in how the term is used. Reflecting on reports published by CSCI, this paper considers whether the choice of the word ‘expert’ in this context is really appropriate and also whether, although well intentioned, the involvement of ‘experts by experience’ is too confused in its rationale to actually empower the people using the services being inspected. The paper concludes by suggesting that the current inspection body—the Care Quality Commission—would do well to review both the terminological and conceptual confusion in respect of this practice.
机译:英国最近对社会护理检查委员会(CSCI)进行的研究表明,没有证据表明服务使用者和非专业评估员参与服务检查可以提高检查质量。但是,CSCI最近启动了一个项目,目的是让“经验丰富的专家”参与他们的服务检查。这里,“经验专家”一词用于描述社会护理服务的用户。但是,这种用法的适当性并非没有挑战,并且在使用该术语时出现了各种概念上的困难。回顾CSCI发布的报告,本文考虑了在这种情况下对“专家”一词的选择是否真的合适,以及尽管有很好的意图,但“经验专家”的介入是否在其理论基础上过于困惑而无法真正赋权使用被检查服务的人员。本文的结论是,建议当前的检查机构(护理质量委员会)很好地审查有关此做法的术语和概念上的混淆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号