首页> 外文期刊>Boston College environmental affairs law review >I Wish They All Could Be Californiaenvironmental Quality Acts: rethinking Nepa In Light Of climate Change
【24h】

I Wish They All Could Be Californiaenvironmental Quality Acts: rethinking Nepa In Light Of climate Change

机译:我希望它们都可以成为加州环境质量法案:根据气候变化重新思考尼泊尔

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Scientific evidence indicates that the repercussions of climate change are numerous, severe, and result from human activity. One possible method of curbing climate change may lie with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires that federal agencies gather and disclose information about the environmental impacts of their activities. Shordy after NEPA's passage, California enacted me California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a statute similar to NEPA addressing the environmental impacts of state and local agencies' activities. One significant departure from NEPA was that CEQA not only required that agencies disclose the environmental impacts of their activities, but that they avoid significant impacts in many circumstances. This Note discusses why omitting this requirement from NEPA makes it less useful in addressing climate change than its California counterpart, compares NEPA to CEQA, and suggests changes which could make NEPA a more useful tool for regulating climate change.
机译:科学证据表明,气候变化的影响是众多的,严重的,是人类活动造成的。遏制气候变化的一种可能方法可能是《国家环境政策法》(NEPA),该法要求联邦机构收集并披露有关其活动对环境的影响的信息。在NEPA通过后,加州颁布了《加利福尼亚环境质量法》(CEQA),这是一项类似于NEPA的法规,涉及州和地方机构活动对环境的影响。与NEPA的一个重大区别是,CEQA不仅要求机构披露其活动对环境的影响,而且还要求它们在许多情况下避免重大影响。本说明讨论了为什么从NEPA中忽略此要求会导致它在解决气候变化方面不及加利福尼亚州的要求,将NEPA与CEQA进行比较,并提出可能使NEPA成为调节气候变化的更有用工具的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号