首页> 外文期刊>Boston College environmental affairs law review >ANYTHING BUT A BREEZE: MOVING FORWARD WITHOUT NFTP WIND COVERAGE
【24h】

ANYTHING BUT A BREEZE: MOVING FORWARD WITHOUT NFTP WIND COVERAGE

机译:一切轻松:无NFTP覆盖的情况下向前移动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The storm season of 2005, with the indelible images of Hurricane Katrina stuck in our minds forever, left much of the Gulf Coast devastated. The aftermath of the storm also caused serious damage to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP or the Program), which provides federally subsidized flood insurance to communities participating in the Program. Following the storms of 2005, many home and building owners and insurance companies began to disagree about the terms of their agreements and the cause of damage upon these structures. The main point of dispute was whether damage could be attributed stricdy to flooding, to wind, or to a combination of both. In an effort to eliminate similar disputes and to enhance the ability for home and business owners to obtain relief for their losses, lawmakers have proposed including wind coverage within the NFIP. This Note will examine the NFIP and the idea of adding muldple peril coverage to the Program. This Note will attempt to explain why adding wind coverage to the NFIP will only further exacerbate the problems for an already fiscally irresponsible program.
机译:2005年的风暴季节,卡特里娜飓风的不可磨灭的影像永远铭刻在我们的脑海中,使墨西哥湾沿岸的大部分地区遭到破坏。风暴的后果还严重损害了国家洪水保险计划(NFIP或该计划),该计划向参与该计划的社区提供了联邦补贴的洪水保险。在2005年的风暴过后,许多房屋和建筑物的所有者以及保险公司开始对协议条款以及这些结构的损坏原因提出异议。争论的重点是破坏是否可以归因于洪水,风或两者的结合。为了消除类似的纠纷,并提高房主和企业主获得赔偿的能力,立法者提议将风电覆盖范围包括在NFIP中。本说明将研究NFIP以及为程序增加Muldple危险覆盖范围的想法。本注释将试图解释为什么将风电覆盖范围增加到NFIP只会进一步加剧已经不负责任的计划的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号