首页> 外文期刊>Boston College environmental affairs law review >THE SAME NEPA PROPOSAL OR CONNECTED NEPA ACTIONS?: WHY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT'S NEW OIL SHALE RULES AND REGULATIONS SHOULD BE SET ASIDE
【24h】

THE SAME NEPA PROPOSAL OR CONNECTED NEPA ACTIONS?: WHY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT'S NEW OIL SHALE RULES AND REGULATIONS SHOULD BE SET ASIDE

机译:相同的NEPA提案或相关的NEPA行动?:为什么应该制定土地管理局新的油页岩规则和法规

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In November 2008, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) finalized a rule opening public land in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming for oil shale leasing and finalized regulations creating policies and procedures for that leasing. The rule and regulations are the BLM's attempt to fulfill their mandate under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to create a commercial oil shale leasing program in the western United States. As federal actions significantly affecting the environment, both the rule and regulations, are subject to the procedural requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The purpose of this Note is to point to two possible errors by the BLM in fulfilling NEPA's procedural requirements. These procedural errors are fodder for citizen-plaintiffs hoping to have the Bush-era rule and regulations judicially set aside and subsequently abandoned by the Obama Administration.
机译:2008年11月,土地管理局(BLM)最终确定了在科罗拉多州,犹他州和怀俄明州开放公共土地进行油页岩租赁的规则,并最终确定了有关租赁政策和程序的法规。规则和条例是BLM试图履行其根据《 2005年能源政策法案》的授权在美国西部创建商业油页岩租赁计划的尝试。由于联邦行动对环境有重大影响,因此规则和法规均受《国家环境政策法》(NEPA)程序要求的约束。本注释的目的是指出BLM在满足NEPA程序要求方面可能出现的两个错误。这些程序上的错误为那些希望将布什时代的规章制度在司法上搁置并随后被奥巴马政府抛弃的市民提出了质疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号