...
首页> 外文期刊>Biomass & bioenergy >Comparative analysis of harvesting machines on an operational high-density short rotation woody crop (SRWC) culture: One-process versus two-process harvest operation
【24h】

Comparative analysis of harvesting machines on an operational high-density short rotation woody crop (SRWC) culture: One-process versus two-process harvest operation

机译:可操作的高密度短轮伐木本作物(SRWC)栽培上的收割机比较分析:单过程与两过程收获操作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Short rotation woody crops (SRWCs) are being studied and cultivated because of their potential for bioenergy production. The harvest operation represents the highest input cost for these short rotation woody crops. We evaluated three different harvesting machines representing two harvesting systems at one operational large-scale SRWC plantation. On average, 8 ton ha~(-1) of biomass was harvested. The cut-and-chip harvesters were faster than the whole stem harvester; and the self-propelled harvester was faster than the tractor-pulled. Harvesting costs differed among the harvesting machines used and ranged from 388 € ha~(-1) to 541 € ha~(-1). The realized stem cutting heights were 15.46 cm and 16.00 cm for the tractor-pulled stem harvester and the self-propelled cut-and-chip harvester respectively, although a cutting height of 10 cm was requested in advance. From the potential harvestable biomass, only 77.4% was harvested by the self-propelled cut-and-chip harvester, while 94.5% was harvested by the tractor-pulled stem harvester. An increase of the machinery use efficiency (i.e. harvest losses, cost) is necessary to reduce costs and increase the competitiveness of biomass with other energy sources.
机译:正在研究和种植短轮伐木本作物(SRWC),因为它们具有生产生物能源的潜力。对于这些短轮伐木本作物来说,收割作业代表了最高的投入成本。我们在一个可操作的大型SRWC人工林中评估了代表两个收割系统的三台不同的收割机。平均而言,收获了8吨ha〜(-1)的生物质。切屑收割机比整个茎收割机快。自走式收割机比拖拉机牵引的要快。收获成本因所使用的收获机而异,范围从388€ha〜(-1)到541€ha〜(-1)。尽管预先要求割断高度为10 cm,但拖拉机牵引式割草机和自走式切屑切碎机的实际割草高度分别为15.46 cm和16.00 cm。自走式切屑收获机仅从潜在的可收获生物量中收获了77.4%,而拖拉机牵引式茎杆收获机则收获了94.5%。为了降低成本并提高生物质与其他能源的竞争力,必须提高机械的使用效率(即收成损失,成本)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Biomass & bioenergy》 |2013年第11期|333-342|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Biology, Research Group of Plant and Vegetation Ecology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium;

    Department of Biology, Research Group of Plant and Vegetation Ecology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium;

    Department of Biology, Research Group of Plant and Vegetation Ecology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Biomass harvesting; Harvesting loses; Cost; New Holland SRC harvester; Ny Vraa; Stemster;

    机译:生物量收获;收获失败;成本;纽荷兰SRC收割机;Ny Vraa;斯特姆斯特;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号