...
首页> 外文期刊>Benchmarking >Evaluation of third-party logistics (3PL) providers by using a two-phase AHP and TOPSIS methodology
【24h】

Evaluation of third-party logistics (3PL) providers by using a two-phase AHP and TOPSIS methodology

机译:使用两阶段AHP和TOPSIS方法评估第三方物流(3PL)提供商

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Third-party logistics (3PL) provider selection has gained great attention in logistics management literature. The purpose of this paper is to provide a good insight into the use of a-two-phase analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) approach that is a multi-criteria decision-making methodology in the evaluation of 3PL providers.rnDesign/methodology/approach - In this paper, after the selection criteria of 3PL providers are determined by modified Delphi method, the weights of criteria have been calculated by applying the AHP method. The TOPSIS method is then employed to achieve the final ranking results. And an actual case example is presented to clarify the methodology. Sensitivity analysis is also given to demonstrate how sensitive the proposed model is to changes in the weights of different main criteria. Findings - This model provides decision makers with a simple, flexible, and easy-to-use approach to evaluate potential 3PL providers efficiently. Findings demonstrate that the proposed benchmarking framework, with minor modifications, can be useful to all firms in their 3PL provider selection decisions.rnResearch limitations/implications - A two-phase AHP and TOPSIS methodology is very flexible and suitable for various decision situations. However, selection of the appropriate 3PL provider requires consideration of multiple alternative solutions and evaluation criteria because of complex methodology, and hence it increases the effort.rnOriginality/value - This is probably the first time that an attempt has been made to apply the modified Delphi method, AHP and TOPSIS methodology in the decision of 3PL provider selection in a Turkish automotive supplier company. This is the most powerful motivation to consider this problem. In addition, the paper is especially of interest to managers as they make decisions on which criteria should be considered in the evaluation process and how a decision model should be structured by using a two-phase AHP and TOPSIS methodology.
机译:目的-第三方物流(3PL)供应商的选择在物流管理文献中得到了极大的关注。本文的目的是通过类似于理想解决方案(TOPSIS)的方法(一种多准则决策方法),提供对两阶段分析层次结构过程(AHP)和订单偏好技术的使用的深入了解设计/方法/方法-本文采用改进的Delphi方法确定了3PL提供者的选择标准,然后采用AHP方法计算了标准的权重。然后采用TOPSIS方法获得最终排名结果。并以实际案例为例说明方法。还进行了敏感性分析,以证明所提出的模型对不同主要标准权重变化的敏感性。调查结果-此模型为决策者提供了一种简单,灵活且易于使用的方法,可以有效地评估潜在的3PL提供者。研究结果表明,所提议的基准框架经过细微修改后,对所有公司的3PL供应商选择决策都是有用的。研究限制/含义-两阶段AHP和TOPSIS方法非常灵活,适用于各种决策情况。但是,由于方法复杂,选择合适的3PL提供程序需要考虑多种替代解决方案和评估标准,从而增加了工作量。原始性/价值-这可能是首次尝试应用修改后的Delphi土耳其汽车供应商公司选择3PL供应商的决策中,应采用AHP方法,AHP和TOPSIS方法。这是考虑此问题的最有力动力。此外,本文特别适合管理人员,因为他们可以通过评估两阶段AHP和TOPSIS方法来决定在评估过程中应考虑哪些标准以及如何构建决策模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号