首页> 外文期刊>Benchmarking >An empirical comparison of pricing models in information technology service outsourcing in Indian context
【24h】

An empirical comparison of pricing models in information technology service outsourcing in Indian context

机译:印度背景下信息技术服务外包中定价模型的实证比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The information technology (IT) outsourcing has been inexorably growing in spite of its downsides. The main reasons are financial gains and cost reductions, as well as it allows companies to focus on their core selling areas. Within IT outsourcing, offshoring has become a big success because it greatly reduces costs. Countries like India, China and Philippines are attracting a lot of IT outsourcing work. In order to save costs, companies have to work out the best pricing models with the vendors so enable profitability at both ends. The main pricing models prevalent in the industry are Time and Material (TnM) and Fixed Time Fixed Price (FTFP) alternately also referred as Fixed Price. There are various other pricing models now, which are mainly variations of these. The purpose of this paper is to show an empirical comparison between these models from the vendor's perspective to see which of them has greater acceptability. Design/methodology/approach - The paper is an empirical paper in which literature survey has been done to study various pricing models in the IT service outsourcing industry, on the basis of same, two most used models have been identified, namely, FTFP and TnM, hypothesis were formulated, Likert scale questionnaire was formed. Subsequently data were collected and Wilcoxon signed-rank test was carried out to compare the variables defining the FTFP and TnM models of pricing. In total, 68 firms were targeted and 120 responses were received. The two models were studied against parameters like usage, profitability, risk, deliveries meeting project schedule, good quality code, the pricing model used by respondents' majority of times and whether either of them lead to increasing costs. Findings - This study has found that TnM is less risky for vendors, more profitable and vendors are able to manage better quality delivery compared to FTFP. Also it has been statistically proven that the pricing models TnM and FTFP do not impact the usage and schedules in any way. These are important findings as there have been no earlier research papers which have compared the pricing models with reference to Indian IT service outsourcing industry. Research limitations/implications - The two major pricing models TnM and FTFP are studied in the paper below. Data were gathered from 68 companies. As per results, TnM is more profitable, less risky, does not lead to increasing cost and produces good quality code as compared to FTFP also it has been statistically proven that the pricing models TnM and FTFP do not impact the usage and schedules in any way. The implications bridge a gap between theory and practice, as theoretically many pricing models exist, however, what are practical applications and justification vis-a-vis different aspects has not been approached statistically so far in the given context. Further research can be done on other variations of pricing models and to establish which one should be the preferred model and in which circumstances. Practical implications - There are major practical implications of the paper as it fills the gap between the theoretical discussions of pricing and identifies and statistically proves importance of various aspects of pricing in practice. Originality/value - The paper is original and adds value in terms of advising the IT service outsourcing companies as to which pricing models to use.
机译:目的-信息技术(IT)外包尽管有不利因素,但仍在不断发展。主要原因是财务收益和成本降低,以及使公司专注于其核心销售领域。在IT外包中,离岸外包已取得了巨大的成功,因为它大大降低了成本。印度,中国和菲律宾等国家正在吸引大量的IT外包工作。为了节省成本,公司必须与供应商一起制定最佳定价模型,以便在两端实现盈利。行业中普遍使用的主要定价模型是时​​间和物料(TnM)和固定时间固定价格(FTFP),也可称为固定价格。现在还有其他各种定价模型,主要是这些模型的变体。本文的目的是从供应商的角度展示这些模型之间的经验比较,以查看其中哪个模型具有更大的可接受性。设计/方法/方法-本文是一份经验性论文,其中进行了文献调查以研究IT服务外包行业中的各种定价模型,在此基础上,确定了两种最常用的模型,即FTFP和TnM提出假设,形成李克特量表。随后收集数据并进行Wilcoxon秩和检验,以比较定义FTFP和TnM定价模型的变量。总共有68家公司成为目标,收到了120份答复。针对这两个模型进行了研究,涉及的参数包括用法,获利能力,风险,符合项目进度的交付,良好的质量代码,受访者大多数时间使用的定价模型以及它们是否导致成本增加。调查结果-这项研究发现,与FTFP相比,TnM对卖方的风险较小,利润更高,并且卖方能够管理更好的质量交付。此外,经统计证明,定价模型TnM和FTFP不会以任何方式影响使用和时间表。这些都是重要的发现,因为没有早期的研究论文将定价模型与印度IT服务外包行业进行比较。研究局限性/含义-以下论文研究了两种主要的定价模型TnM和FTFP。数据来自68家公司。根据结果​​,与FTFP相比,TnM利润更高,风险更低,不会导致成本增加并且不会产生高质量的代码,而且统计证明TnM和FTFP定价模型不会以任何方式影响使用和进度。这意味着弥合理论与实践之间的鸿沟,因为理论上存在许多定价模型,但是,在给定的背景下,到目前为止,还没有从统计角度探讨什么是实际应用以及相对于不同方面的合理性。可以对定价模型的其他变体进行进一步研究,并确定哪种模型应该是首选模型,以及在哪种情况下。实际意义-该论文具有重大的实际意义,因为它填补了定价理论讨论之间的空白,并在实践中确定并统计证明了定价各个方面的重要性。原创性/价值-本文是原创文章,它在为IT服务外包公司建议使用哪种定价模型方面增加了价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号