...
首页> 外文期刊>The Australian and New Zealand wine industry journal >Review of national structures: time for progressive thinking
【24h】

Review of national structures: time for progressive thinking

机译:审查国家结构:进取思维的时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Review of National Organisational Structures (NOS Review) has attracted some attention in these pages, most recently from Paul Clancy, Chairman of the Wine Grape Council of SA ('You can't build a pyramid from the pointy end down', Nov/Dec 2007).rnPaul Clancy's central argument was that a merger of the winemaker and grapegrower peak bodies is fanciful, and that there is no case for change to any of the national body structures. He also argued that meaningful change would only be achieved by strengthening State and regional bodies because "The Australian wine industry is structurally weak at regional and State levels".
机译:国家组织结构审查(NOS审查)在这些页面中引起了一定的关注,最近一次是来自SA酿酒葡萄理事会主席Paul Clancy(“您不能从尖尖的末端开始建造金字塔”,11月/ 2007年12月)。保罗·克兰西(Paul Clancy)的中心论点是酿酒师和葡萄种植者的最高身分合并是幻想的,并且没有任何改变任何国家身分的理由。他还争辩说,只有通过加强州和地区机构才能实现有意义的改变,因为“澳大利亚葡萄酒行业在地区和州一级的结构薄弱”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号