首页> 外文期刊>Australian intellectual property journal >E-Books and the Principle of Technological Neutrality: Should Public Lending Right Schemes Apply to E-Lending?
【24h】

E-Books and the Principle of Technological Neutrality: Should Public Lending Right Schemes Apply to E-Lending?

机译:电子书和技术中立原则:公开贷款是否适用于电子贷款?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Public Lending Right (PLR) and Educational Lending Right (ELR) schemes are remunerating Australian authors and publishers for making available their books in Australian libraries. However, e-books are currently not included under these schemes. With the expansion of the e-book market and e-lending services within Australian libraries, it has been suggested that the schemes should be technologically neutral and extend to include e-books. After an extensive analysis of the technological neutrality principle, this article concludes this principle does not impose a legal obligation to extend PLR and ELR to e-books since traditional lending and e-lending are not functionally and economically equivalent services. Nevertheless, such an extension could be favourable when taking into account other economic, cultural and political circumstances.
机译:公共贷款权利(PLR)和教育贷款权利(ELR)计划正在汇报澳大利亚作者和出版商,以便在澳大利亚图书馆提供他们的书籍。但是,电子书目前不包括在这些方案下。随着澳大利亚图书馆内的电子书市场和电子贷款服务的扩展,有人提出了这些计划应该是技术中立的并且延伸到包括电子书。在对技术中立原则进行广泛分析后,本文得出结论,这一原则不会施加法律义务,以便将PLR和ELR扩展到电子书以来,因为传统的贷款和电子贷款在功能上和经济上的等价服务。尽管如此,在考虑到其他经济,文化和政治环境时,这种延伸可能是有利的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号