...
首页> 外文期刊>Auditing >Auditor Industry Specialization, Client Bargaining Power, and Audit Fees: Further Evidence
【24h】

Auditor Industry Specialization, Client Bargaining Power, and Audit Fees: Further Evidence

机译:审计师行业专长,客户讨价还价能力和审计费用:进一步的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Casterella, Francis, Lewis, and Walker (CFLW 2004) find, using survey data from 1993, that (1) there is a Big 6 industry specialization audit fee premium in the small client segment of the U.S. audit market, but (2) audit fees decrease for large companies as the client becomes increasingly large relative to an auditor's clientele. In this study, we first replicate and confirm the results of CFLW (2004), using audit fee data from SEC filings for fiscal 2000 and 2001. In the post-SOX period, we find that the results related to specialization continue to hold in fiscal 2004 but not in 2003— suggesting that 2003 is perhaps a unique year due to the flux in the audit market following the enactment of SOX. With respect to client bargaining power, our results in the post-SOX period differ from CFLW (2004) in that we observe a negative association between client bargaining power and audit fees for both the small and large client segments.
机译:Casterella,Francis,Lewis和Walker(CFLW 2004)使用1993年的调查数据发现(1)在美国审计市场的小客户群体中,存在六大行业专业化审计费用溢价,但是(2)审计随着客户相对于审计人员的客户越来越大,大型公司的费用会减少。在本研究中,我们首先使用来自SEC的2000年度和2001年度财务报告中的审计费用数据来复制并确认CFLW(2004年)的结果。在SOX后时期,我们发现与专业化相关的结果继续存在于2004年,但不是2003年。这表明由于SOX颁布之后审计市场的变化,2003年也许是一个独特的年份。关于客户议价能力,我们在SOX后时期的结果与CFLW(2004年)不同,因为我们观察到小型和大型客户领域的客户议价能力与审计费用之间存在负相关关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号