首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric research >Comparison of Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System and National Fire Danger Rating System fire indices derived from Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model data for the June 2005 Interior Alaska wildfires
【24h】

Comparison of Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System and National Fire Danger Rating System fire indices derived from Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model data for the June 2005 Interior Alaska wildfires

机译:从2005年6月阿拉斯加内陆野火的天气研究和预测(WRF)模型数据得出的加拿大森林火灾危险等级系统和国家火灾危险等级系统的火灾指数比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Standard indices of the National Fire Danger Rating System (NFDRS) and Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System (CFFDRS) are calculated from Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model forecasts and observations in Interior Alaska for June 2005. Fire indices determined from WRF results of all forecast-leads and the ensemble do not differ statistically significantly from those calculated from observations. WRF-derived CFFDRS and NFDRS fire indices capture the temporal evolution of fire indices calculated from observations acceptably. Sensitivity to errors in meteorological forecasts differs for the various fire indices. Failure to predict a peak does not necessarily occur at the same time for the various indices within and/or among the two systems. Predicted buildup-index and spread component capture trends, the time of peaks and minima most reliably. Overall for the CFFDRS the lowest relative errors exist for fine fuel moisture content followed by buildup-index while for the NFDRS the lowest relative errors occur for energy release component followed by burning index. When fire indices are calculated from meteorological forecasts predicting fire risk and identifying the right site becomes more difficult as fire risk increases. Fire risk forecast skill depends on meteorological forecast-lead slightly for energy release rate and ignition component and notably for all CFFDRS-indices except fine fuel moisture content.
机译:国家火灾危险等级系统(NFDRS)和加拿大森林火灾危险等级系统(CFFDRS)的标准指数是根据2005年6月在阿拉斯加内陆的天气研究与预测(WRF)模型的预测和观察得出的。在统计上,所有预测线索和集合与从观测值计算得出的结果在统计学上均无显着差异。 WRF衍生的CFFDRS和NFDRS火指数捕获了根据观察结果计算得出的火指数的时间演变。各种火灾指数对气象预报错误的敏感性不同。对于两个系统内和/或之中的各种指标,不一定会同时发生无法预测峰值的情况。预测的聚集指数和散布成分捕获趋势,峰值时间和最小值最可靠。总体而言,对于CFFDRS,细燃料水分含量的最低相对误差存在,其后为堆积指数,而对于NFDRS,能量释放成分的最低相对误差则为燃烧指数。当根据气象预测计算火灾指数时,随着火灾风险的增加,预测火灾风险并确定正确的地点变得更加困难。火灾风险预测技能在一定程度上取决于气象预测引线,以了解能量释放速率和点火组件,尤其是对于所有CFFDRS指标(细燃料水分含量除外)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Atmospheric research》 |2010年第3期|290-306|共17页
  • 作者

    Nicole Moelders;

  • 作者单位

    University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute and College of Natural Science and Mathematics, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, 903 Koyukuk Drive,P.O. Box 757320, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7320, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    fire indices; WRF; mesoscale modeling; fire weather; polar weather;

    机译:防火指标;WRF;中尺度建模;大火天气;极地天气;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号